zentrale@rmi.UUCP (11/03/87)
[This was posted to comp.sources.misc; I place it here because it is a valid complaint. Note that my "charter" as moderator requires me to get sources out as fast as possible; in particular, this does NOT include writing summaries. It is up to the author of a submission to doocument it adequately. ++bsa] Many interesting and valuable sources have been published here. The only thing I have to "complain" abt is: You have to guess what the author meant when giving the source such a name. If you are looking at those articles it would be a good idea to find a short abstract BEFORE any shell scripts (snip---snip---snip) starts... It is somtimes not very easy to determine the use of a 13 part distribution without reading all 14 packages first, just to see: it's nothing for me. So: why not publish a -short- abstract first, giving purpose, target system(s) etc.? -Rupert Mohr ***************************************************************** * addresses: uucp rmohr@rmi.uucp rmohr@unido.bitnet * * bix rmiaachen Btx 024121144-0001 * * cis 72446,415 * *****************************************************************