goehring@cs.purdue.EDU (Scott Goehring) (02/04/89)
Part 3 of the recent post of ZOO to comp.sources.unix was truncated.
Would appreciate a repost.
Scott
--
Scott Goehring | Arpanet: goehring@cs.purdue.edu
---------------' UUCP: ...!{decwrl,gatech,ucbvax}!purdue!goehring
FidoNet: 1:201/80 Purdue: eyu@n, gms@mentor, qbu@mentor
EggNet: 99:9700/80tadguy@cs.odu.edu (Tad Guy) (02/04/89)
In article <5972@medusa.cs.purdue.edu>, goehring@cs (Scott Goehring) writes: >Part 3 of the recent post of ZOO to comp.sources.unix was truncated. The part03 that arrived here wasn't. You can get our copy via anonymous ftp to xanth.cs.odu.edu. >Would appreciate a repost. Why not contact the moderator first to see how widespread the damage is? ...tad -- Tad Guy <tadguy@cs.odu.edu> Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA
greggh@psu-cs.UUCP (Gregg Harris) (02/10/89)
> In article <5972@medusa.cs.purdue.edu>, goehring@cs (Scott Goehring) writes: > >Part 3 of the recent post of ZOO to comp.sources.unix was truncated. > > The part03 that arrived here wasn't. > You can get our copy via anonymous ftp to xanth.cs.odu.edu. > > >Would appreciate a repost. > > Why not contact the moderator first to see how widespread the damage is? > > ...tad > > -- > Tad Guy <tadguy@cs.odu.edu> Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA Part 2 didn't make it here. Please repost. Thanks --- Gregg Harris usnet tektronix!psu-cs!greggh Portland State University, Portland, OR
tadguy@cs.odu.edu (Tad Guy) (02/14/89)
In article <1626@psu-cs.UUCP>, greggh@psu-cs (Gregg Harris) writes: >> In article <5972@medusa.cs.purdue.edu>, goehring@cs (Scott Goehring) writes: >> >Part 3 of the recent post of ZOO to comp.sources.unix was truncated. >> >Would appreciate a repost. >> >> Why not contact the moderator first to see how widespread the damage is? >> >Part 2 didn't make it here. >Please repost. I don't want to sound offensive, but you missed the (admittedly subtle) message in the posting you replied to. It was basically that a repost isn't necessary unless the problem is widespread. Let your system administrator know you didn't get it -- he should check with his upstream feeds. You received the other parts, why not send a message to the author listed in part01 asking for the missing part? It's a waste to repost something if you're the only one needing it. It's still a waste even if you aren't the only one. ...tad