[comp.sources.d] FSF censorship

wrf@mab.ecse.rpi.edu (Wm Randolph Franklin) (06/07/90)

Seen while browsing the source for gawk:

X@comment We don't refer people to non-free information
X@comment  In 1988, the original authors
X@comment published @cite{The AWK Programming Language} (Addison-Wesley, ISBN
X@comment 0-201-07981-X), as a definitive description of the @code{awk} language.

Not too friendly given they later thank Brian Kernighan for his help
with gawk.
-- 
						   Wm. Randolph Franklin
Internet: wrf@ecse.rpi.edu (or @cs.rpi.edu)    Bitnet: Wrfrankl@Rpitsmts
Telephone: (518) 276-6077;  Telex: 6716050 RPI TROU; Fax: (518) 276-6261
Paper: ECSE Dept., 6026 JEC, Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst, Troy NY, 12180

zoo@aps3.spa.umn.edu (david d [zoo] zuhn) (06/07/90)

Wm> Seen while browsing the source for gawk:

Wm> X@comment We don't refer people to non-free information
Wm> X@comment  In 1988, the original authors
Wm> X@comment published @cite{The AWK Programming Language} (Addison-Wesley, ISBN
Wm> X@comment 0-201-07981-X), as a definitive description of the @code{awk} language.

Wm> Not too friendly given they later thank Brian Kernighan for his help
Wm> with gawk.

I don't speak for the FSF nor the authors of gawk, but I would say
that the non-free information they spoke of was the original paper and
man page from V7 awk, which is not redistributable as far as I know.
On the other hand, the book certainly is free, in the sense that there
is no licensing agreements that you need to buy to get access to it.


david d [zoo] zuhn		Univ. of Minnesota Dept. of Astronomy
zoo@aps1.spa.umn.edu		Automated Plate Scanner	Project

fischer@iesd.auc.dk (Lars P. Fischer) (06/07/90)

In article <RG`$}?$@rpi.edu> wrf@mab.ecse.rpi.edu (Wm Randolph Franklin) writes:
>Seen while browsing the source for gawk:
>
>X@comment We don't refer people to non-free information
>X@comment  In 1988, the original authors
>X@comment published @cite{The AWK Programming Language} (Addison-Wesley, ISBN
>X@comment 0-201-07981-X), as a definitive description of the
>@code{awk} language.
>
>Not too friendly given they later thank Brian Kernighan for his help
>with gawk.

Why is this censorship? You might not agree, and it might not be vary
friendly, but censorship? 

/Lars
--
Lars Fischer,  fischer@iesd.auc.dk   | NeXT: A disaster looking for a place
CS Dept., Univ. of Aalborg, DENMARK. | to happen  -- Bill Joy

arnold@audiofax.com (Arnold Robbins) (06/07/90)

(To those of you on gnu.misc.discuss, this started in comp.sources.d;
followups are to gnu.misc.discuss.)

Let's set the record straight on the facts, and then move on to other topics.

Wm> Seen while browsing the source for gawk:

Wm> X@comment We don't refer people to non-free information
Wm> X@comment  In 1988, the original authors
Wm> X@comment published @cite{The AWK Programming Language} (Addison-Wesley, ISBN
Wm> X@comment 0-201-07981-X), as a definitive description of the @code{awk} language.

Wm> Not too friendly given they later thank Brian Kernighan for his help
Wm> with gawk.

In article <ZOO.90Jun6142322@aps3.spa.umn.edu> zoo@aps3.spa.umn.edu (david d [zoo] zuhn) writes:
>I don't speak for the FSF nor the authors of gawk, but I would say
>that the non-free information they spoke of was the original paper and
>man page from V7 awk, which is not redistributable as far as I know.
>On the other hand, the book certainly is free, in the sense that there
>is no licensing agreements that you need to buy to get access to it.

The quoted part of the gawk manual is from my revisions to it.  I wanted
to cite the awk book by Aho et. al., but RMS said not to.  The book is
not "free" in the FSF sense: I can buy a copy, but I cannot legally make
1000 photo-copies and give them away; although the book was produced from
machine-readable source, said source is not available nor freely distributable.

In practice it makes little difference, as everyone knows that there is
an awk book and can buy (or borrow) a copy if they want it.

As for BWK, he was very helpful, and it is fair to give him credit for
his help; it is orthogonal to the issue of citing his book.

As to whether or not RMS is "right" or "wrong", I don't care to debate
(i.e. flame > /dev/null). Part of participating in the GNU project is
playing by their rules.
-- 
Arnold Robbins				AudioFAX, Inc. | Laundry increases
2000 Powers Ferry Road, #220 / Marietta, GA. 30067     | exponentially in the
INTERNET: arnold@audiofax.com	Phone: +1 404 933 7600 | number of children.
UUCP:	  emory!audfax!arnold	Fax:   +1 404 933 7606 |   -- Miriam Robbins