[comp.sources.d] information use and intellectual property

oz@yunexus.yorku.ca (Ozan Yigit) (06/29/90)

In article <DRW.90Jun25214521@pascal.mit.edu> Dale R. Worley
(drw@pascal.mit.edu) writes:

>Having talked to RMS about this, I assure you that he believes that
>all embodiments of "intellectual property" are fundamentally immoral.
>Thus, the concepts of the GPL should be extended to absolutely all
>works now copyrighted.

also, in article <239@audfax.audiofax.com> Arnold Robbins
(arnold@audiofax.com) writes:

>Disbelief that this could really be the case is what started the whole
>discussion.  As evidenced by Dale's article, not encouraging non-free
>information is part and parcel of the FSF's ideals.

I think "morality" is a topic better dealt elsewhere, and I further think
that RMS's or FSF's belief system(s) are inconsequential so long as they
remain inarticulated. In my view, neither the statements within GPL, nor
those in the GNU Manifesto are sufficient to formulate a whole philosophy
on "intellectual property" or "information morality/ethics" by any stretch
of the imagination. 

If there are any substantial arguments (instead of obscure comments in
source code) to be made in the topic of "intellectual property" (as
manifested in works now copyrighted), in a manner that is suitable for
public/academic interpretation and discussion, I would look forward to it.
In other words, if there is something important to say, would somebody
properly say it so we can all consider its significance for ourselves?

This issue, however, is only peripheral to the issue of giving *proper
credit* where one is due, whether that be books, personal communication,
source code, whatever. So the question really is *whether or not the awk
book is used as a reference* during the development of GAWK, rather than
*the status of information* contained therein. If it *was* used, than the
least I expect is a proper reference: it is my opinion that the quality
of a tool, or its public usefullness does not absolve the authors from the
responsibility towards other works that made the tool possible.

regards..	oz
---
First learn your horn and all the theory.       Internet: oz@nexus.yorku.ca
Next develop a style. Then forget all that      uucp: utzoo/utai!yunexus!oz
and just play.          Charlie Parker [?]      York U. CCS: (416) 736 5257