[comp.sources.d] Recent posting of wcl in comp.sources.x bad?!

brown@ftms.UUCP (Vidiot) (12/27/90)

While tearing apart, actually right before, I discovered that the posting of
the wcl sources seems to be in error.  First off, many of the postings were
repeated and parts 3 and 4 appear to be duplicates of 1 and 2, respectively.
Parts 3 and 4 start out for those parts and then all of a sudden change to
parts 1 and 2, right there in the header.  Oh, and the posting says 11 parts,
when 12 show up.

Needless to say, I don't trust the posting and am dumping the whole thing
into the bit bucket, awaiting arrival of a posting that is correct.
-- 
harvard\
  ucbvax!uwvax!astroatc!ftms!brown
rutgers/
INTERNET: spool.cs.wisc.edu!astroatc!ftms!brown