jv@mh.nl (Johan Vromans) (01/27/91)
Since a good, reliable, portable archiver like zoo or lharc is a very
valuable tool for the UseNet society, how about trying to start
coordinated efforts to obtain such a tool. The currently existing zoo
and lharc programs may be a good start, their creators might wish to
join (or lead?) the team.
A dedicated newgroup or maling-list would be the first step..
Johan
--
Johan Vromans jv@mh.nl via internet backbones
Multihouse Automatisering bv uucp: ..!{uunet,hp4nl}!mh.nl!jv
Doesburgweg 7, 2803 PL Gouda, The Netherlands phone/fax: +31 1820 62911/62500
------------------------ "Arms are made for hugging" -------------------------xanthian@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG (Kent Paul Dolan) (01/29/91)
Johan Vromans <jv@mh.nl> writes: > Since a good, reliable, portable archiver like zoo or lharc is a very > valuable tool for the UseNet society, how about trying to start > coordinated efforts to obtain such a tool. The currently existing zoo > and lharc programs may be a good start, their creators might wish to > join (or lead?) the team. > A dedicated newgroup or maling-list would be the first step.. Please feel free to use comp.sys.amiga.datacomm for such a discussion; archiving, compression, and data sharing techniques are all explicitly part of its charter, and are all reasonably platform independent questions, by their very nature. /// It's Amiga /// for me: why Kent, the man from xanth. \\\/// settle for <xanthian@Zorch.SF-Bay.ORG> <xanthian@well.sf.ca.us> \XX/ anything less? -- Convener, COMPLETED comp.sys.amiga grand reorganization.
russell@ccu1.aukuni.ac.nz (Russell J Fulton;ccc032u) (01/31/91)
xanthian@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG (Kent Paul Dolan) writes: >Johan Vromans <jv@mh.nl> writes: >> Since a good, reliable, portable archiver like zoo or lharc is a very >> [.....] >> A dedicated newgroup or maling-list would be the first step.. >Please feel free to use comp.sys.amiga.datacomm for such a discussion; >archiving, compression, and data sharing techniques are all explicitly >part of its charter, and are all reasonably platform independent >questions, by their very nature. Yes but will most of us think of looking there. I am not interested in Amigas (I am sure they are fine machines I just don't have access to one, nor do I have the time for idle curiosity :-(.) and have unsubscrided the comp.sys.amiga hierarchy. Russell. -- Russell Fulton, Computer Center, University of Auckland, New Zealand. <rj_fulton@aukuni.ac.nz>
xanthian@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG (Kent Paul Dolan) (02/01/91)
>Johan Vromans <jv@mh.nl> writes: > Since a good, reliable, portable archiver like zoo or lharc is a very > [valuable resource to the net, let's work on one.] A dedicated > newgroup or maling-list would be the first step. xanthian@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG (Kent Paul Dolan) writes: > Please feel free to use comp.sys.amiga.datacomm for such a discussion; > archiving, compression, and data sharing techniques are all explicitly > part of its charter, and are all reasonably platform independent > questions, by their very nature. russell@ccu1.aukuni.ac.nz (Russell J Fulton;ccc032u) writes: > Yes but will most of us think of looking there. I am not interested in > Amigas (I am sure they are fine machines I just don't have access to > one, nor do I have the time for idle curiosity :-(.) and have > unsubscrided the comp.sys.amiga hierarchy. That's probably why I keep posting this same invitation everywhere I see this question arise. Having conducted not one, but two net votes, for a total of 13 newsgroups, I can recommend it mostly as a pain to be avoided where possible. Since a group with modest traffic exists in which such conversations would be appropriate and welcome, is it out of line to recommend that it be used for that purpose? Surely resubscribing to one newsgroup can't be that big a trial? I will freely admit to having included comp.sys.amiga.datacomm in the Amiga hierarchy reorganization partially with malice aforethought to make up for the lack of a group anywhere on the net focusing on data compression, since I tried to get such a discussion rolling this past summer at the time of the great LZ compression patent ballyhoo with only a little, short term success. I'm utterly convinced that current reverseable, general purpose compression technology is nowhere close to the limits of efficient compression, just because the results on image data are so far below potential. It may be that useful research work can be done in this discipline over the net, but that remains an open question. Kent, the man from xanth. <xanthian@Zorch.SF-Bay.ORG> <xanthian@well.sf.ca.us>