hugh@gargoyle.uchicago.edu (Hugh Miller) (03/25/91)
I'm having a hell of a time trying to compile lharc v.0.03 Beta on the SunOS 3.5 machine here. the program compiles OK with no "switchies" (I love it!) set, but it does some weird things to filenames with periods. When I pull the resultant .lzh files down to my Mess-DOS 3.3 system and shez them open, the filenames show control-chars where periods had been in the original UNIX filenames, and sometimes the .lzh file filenames are truncated. Anybody know enough about lharc to give me a hand? Thanks! Hugh Miller | Dept. of Philosophy | Loyola University of Chicago Voice: 312-508-2727 | FAX: 312-508-2292 | UUCP: hugh@gargoyle.uchicago.edu Disclaimer: Prius solum praesto. | BITNET: #L69HEM@LUCCPUA
nemossan@uitec.ac.jp (Sakurao NEMOTO) (03/25/91)
Expires: References: <hugh.669841364@gargoyle.uchicago.edu> Sender: Followup-To: Distribution: Organization: Univ. Industrial Tech., Sagamihara, JAPAN Keywords: In article <hugh.669841364@gargoyle.uchicago.edu> hugh@gargoyle.uchicago.edu (Hugh Miller) writes: > > I'm having a hell of a time trying to compile lharc v.0.03 Beta on >the SunOS 3.5 machine here. the program compiles OK with no "switchies" LHarc v.0.03 is rather older one, I think. I'm usually using v1.02 by Y.Tagawa, and it works fine in both unix and minix. But in MS-DOS, newer-version of LHarc, LHA is released. LHA-v2.11 is released source-codes besides executable one. Thus, I hope new-version for *nix to be released by someone, for if you archive some files in LHA, you cannot dearchive by conventional LHarc, unless -o parameter (meaning older format). Latest verion of LHA in MS-DOS is now 2.12.