awylie@pyr1.cs.ucl.ac.uk (01/07/88)
Hello, I would like to tell you about an interesting but now little-known semiconductor device, the point-contact transistor (PCT). Most of you should know that the transistor was invented at Bell Labs. In fact, the PCT was stumbled upon by Bardeen and Brattain in late 1947 and announced by Bell Labs in mid 1948. The junction transistor (JT) for which Shockley was searching was not fabricated until 1951. Early JTs had a very poor frequency response, but this was overcome when techniques were developed to create a narrow base region, and the PCT rapidly fell out of favour and was discontinued. For those of you who are not familiar with it, the PCT was normally made using a die of N-type germanium to which was attached an ohmic contact to make the transistor base. Two sharply-pointed phosphor-bronze wires were pressed into the opposite side of the die a short distance apart, these constituted the collector and emitter. A high current was passed through these wires for a short period in order to fuse the points onto the germanium. This process was called "forming" and at the time it involved more magic than physics. Later theory suggested that forming created P-type regions at the point contacts by diffusion of phosphorous out of the wires. Many introductory electronics books mention the PCT in one sentence and give the impression that it was a kind of inferior JT which was purely a historical aberration. This is incorrect, the PCT was a very different device indeed from what we now call a "transistor", and its operation was never fully understood, although elaborate theories were thought up to explain it. If you obtain an older electronics book which devotes a few paragraphs to the PCT, it will surely mention the one fact which clearly distinguishes it from the JT - the PCT has an alpha which is greater than one, and can exceed 10 under certain conditions! It requires only a moment's thought to conclude that the base current in a PCT flows in the opposite direction to that in a JT. I have never seen this obvious fact mentioned in print. In a PNP JT an electron current flows into the base and out of the emitter, it is typically 1% of the collector current. In an N-type PCT under typical conditions 50% of the electron current flowing into the collector flows OUT of the base contact. This tells us that the physics of the PCT are very different from those of the JT. The device may not seem very attractive as an amplifier since all three electrodes carry currents of similar magnitude, but large power gains are possible because of the low input impedance in common-base. In addition, apart from its development earlier than the JT, it possesses two further advantages which were responsible for its survival for a number of years. Firstly, the points can be placed very close together, about 1 thousandth of an inch apart, which results in a narrow base region and an extended high frequency cutoff, 100 times higher than that of early JTs. Secondly, again revealing its different physics, the collector and emitter characteristics can exhibit negative resistance. This is ideal for making oscillators and switches, for example a flipflop can be made using one transistor. PCTs were employed in early telephone equipment and in computers, as well as in linear applications such as radios and hearing aids, to which they were less well suited. The first PCTs were made by Bell Labs, but they licensed their technology to all comers at a symposium in 1951. Subsequently at least 14 American companies manufactured PCTs, and 3 British ones. Over the next few years several million PCTs were produced, most of which were sold to the US military. Early types were unreliable and their characteristics varied wildly, but later types were much more stable. These were extremely robust, and could withstand thousands of g's of acceleration. The notion that a PCT could be destroyed by dropping it on the floor is totally wrong! Now comes the hard sell - obviously I am very interested in PCTs, and I would like to obtain specimens of any which have survived. So many were produced that thousands must still be lying around in junk boxes and the like. I have a few British types but American ones seem very hard to find. I am also keen to obtain early junction types, and early data sheets or data books. Other semiconductor oddities also interest me - did you know that several types of junction tetrode transistors existed in 1956? And that even pentode transistors were made? If you have anything of possible interest to me, please send a mail. I would be happy to pay postage and a nominal price for any material which does interest me, but I am not a millionaire and you will not get rich by selling me a few old transistors! Even if you have devices which you do not want to part with, or you have an interesting story about transistors, or you would just like to know more, do contact me. I have a list of most of the transistor types which I want to obtain and I will mail it on request. Below is a condensed version which covers only point-contact transistors: it has taken 10 years of research to make this list - information about PCTs is hard to come by! I hope to hear from you soon, Andrew. Please give a copy of this article to anyone you know who might be interested! Point-Contact Transistors - any specimens or data sheets wanted *************************************************************** CBS-Hytron PT-2A, PT-2S Clevite 2N50 to 2N53 GE USA G11, G11A, 2N30 Hydro-Aire A-0 to A-3, S-0 to S-2 LCT 3698, 3768 National Union T18A, T18B Radio Receptor R1698, R1729, R1734 Raytheon CK716 RCA 2N32, 2N33 Sprague Electric 5A, 2N159 Sylvania 2N32 Texas Instruments 102, 103 Transistor Products 2A to 2H, 2L, 2N32, 2N33, 2N50 to 2N53 Western Electric 'A' series, M1689, M1729, M1734, M1768 etc., " " 2N21A, 2N21 to 2N26, 2N67, 2N110 Westinghouse WX-3347 GEC UK EW51, EW61, GET1, GET2 Mullard UK OC50, OC51 STC UK LS737, 3X/100N, 3X/101N, TP1, TP2 ------------------------------------------------------------ Andrew Wylie, University of London Computer Centre, 20 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1DZ, England. JANET: andrew@uk.ac.ulcc.ncdlab UUCP: ..!mcvax!ukc!cs.ucl.ac.uk!awylie ARPA: awylie@cs.ucl.ac.uk BITNET: andrew%uk.ac.ulcc.ncdlab@ac.uk If replying via satnet please give a UUCP path from mcvax to your site.