fgk@well.UUCP (Frank G Kienast) (07/09/89)
I have a problem every year during the late summer and fall with crickets gathering in the bushes outside my window. It seems I once read in some project magazine that it is possible to repel insects such as crickets using ultrasonic frequency sound. Could anyone point me to the source of a relatively simple circuit for doing this? Also where to get the ultrasonic transducer that I presumably will need. In real life: Frank Kienast Well: well!fgk@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU CIS: 73327,3073 V-mail: 804-980-3733
vaso@mips.COM (Vaso Bovan) (07/11/89)
In article <12630@well.UUCP> fgk@well.UUCP (Frank G Kienast) writes: > >I have a problem every year during the late summer and fall with crickets >gathering in the bushes outside my window. It seems I once read in some >project magazine that it is possible to repel insects such as crickets using >ultrasonic frequency sound. Could anyone point me to the source of a >relatively simple circuit for doing this? Also where to get the ultrasonic >transducer that I presumably will need. > "Ultrasonic Pest Control" does not work, notwithstanding the fact there are manufacturers getting rich selling these fraudulent devices. As I understand it, U.S. Army tests showed that such machines have little effect on mammals such as mice and dogs, and no effect on mosquitoes and other insects. No I can't quote a source.
wiz@xroads.UUCP (Mike Carter) (07/12/89)
> In article <12630@well.UUCP> fgk@well.UUCP (Frank G Kienast) writes: > > > > > "Ultrasonic Pest Control" does not work, notwithstanding the fact there are > manufacturers getting rich selling these fraudulent devices. As I understand > it, U.S. Army tests showed that such machines have little effect on mammals > such as mice and dogs, and no effect on mosquitoes and other insects. No I > can't quote a source. We should take a moment here to consider what the Ultrasonic "Pest" controllers were originally designed to do. From the information that I have they were originally made to repell such nasties like Cockroaches, Crickets, beetles and their genre'. The scientific application notes include some rather amusing data which I'll throw in here a little further. The frequencies involved here are pretty wide for each of the above listed pests. Most units (the cheepies) transmit a single frequency (usually around 22KHZ) and have little effect. The better units (my kit built job) oscillate up and down from 21KHZ up to 28KHZ. At these frequencies the membranes and scilia on a lot of these creatures will oscillate in kind if the unit is powerfull enough. To test this, I captured about a dozen crickets an put them in my converted fish tank - specimen observatory a few years back..gave them water and lots of dog food ( a treat they adore ) and the ventillation provided by the overhead screen & fan. ...one nasty treatsie included was this "Repeller". I went to work and came back about 10 hours later to find all but two of them stone dead under a rock. I ran this unit for about 2 weeks..until my wife mentioned that both Wolves and the two cats stayed clear of the kitchen where I had it operating. The cats refused to enter the kitchen (where their bowls were) and she resorted to feeding them in the family room. The wolves were'nt immediately affected but the best shaded spot nearest the window was always vacant. I imagine it became more of an irratant to them than anything else. I'd like to read the U.S. Army's refutation..if it is indeed that..more than likely (I'ma reservist) they were testing them to determine usesage in camp environments in the field or some twisted anti-personnel device. A side issue in this journal was included in the discussion of ultrasonic laborratory tests. It involved the testing against cockroaches [mentioning that different species required different frequencies due to size and make-up] and that a blunder brought about an interesting result in some electronic measuring scales used at meat markets....apparently the clowns who designed this one type of scale were getting complaints from owners who said the scales would cease to operate after about 3-4 months of use. The units were sent back into the factory for repair..where.. much to the dismay of the technicians upon removal of the pressure plate, thousands upon thousands of dead cockroaches could be found. The dead mass of *** YUCK *** interfered with the crossed taught wires (Strain guage) -thereby producing erroneous measurements. WHY ? Well, after a little research they discovered someone who affirmed that the resonance or vibrations on these wires caused by (lots of verbage) produced a 14KHZ sound wave. This just so happens to be the mating frequency of la cucharacha..the despised cockroach. I tested this out..being the sinister, scheeming, practical joker that I am at times...by making a piezio transducer that operated near 14KHZ. Filled the project box full of holes, two series-aiding 9-V batteries and a makeshift disguise later and whala-- THE COCKROACH GRENADE is born. Not nice. Enjoy -- ============================================================================= = Mike Carter N7GYX, Phoenix AZ| Q: Why did the Chicken cross the road ? = = hplabs!hp-sdd!crash!xroads!wiz| A: To ESCape the Main Menu . = =============================================================================
sukenick@ccnysci.UUCP (SYG) (07/22/89)
In article <760@xroads.UUCP> wiz@xroads.UUCP (Mike Carter) writes: >this "Repeller". I went to work and came back about 10 hours later to find >all but two of them stone dead under a rock. Sorry Mike, but this doesnt show anything except that some bugs died in your bug paradise box. You should have two identical setups one with your "Repeller" and one without.....if the bugs in the Repeller box dies and the ones in the other box are ok, then the evidence would be more convincing. (One of these days I'm going to experiment with one of these things. Thanks for the suggestion of frequency range)