nagle@well.UUCP (John Nagle) (12/13/89)
Because of the continuing heavy traffic on the subject of radar
detectors and similar devices in the groups misc.legal, sci.electronics,
and occasionally rec.ham-radio, I suggest the formation of a new group
to handle this topic.
I suggest the name "rec.speeding".
John Naglerussotto@eng.umd.edu (Matthew T. Russotto) (12/14/89)
In article <14965@well.UUCP> nagle@well.UUCP (John Nagle) writes: > > Because of the continuing heavy traffic on the subject of radar >detectors and similar devices in the groups misc.legal, sci.electronics, >and occasionally rec.ham-radio, I suggest the formation of a new group >to handle this topic. > > I suggest the name "rec.speeding". > Wouldn't this go in the newly-proposed 'rec.autos.driving'? -- Matthew T. Russotto russotto@eng.umd.edu russotto@wam.umd.edu ][, ][+, ///, ///+, //e, //c, IIGS, //c+ --- Any questions?
marks@ssdevo.enet.dec.com (12/14/89)
In article <14965@well.UUCP>, nagle@well.UUCP (John Nagle) writes... > > Because of the continuing heavy traffic on the subject of radar >detectors and similar devices in the groups misc.legal, sci.electronics, >and occasionally rec.ham-radio, I suggest the formation of a new group >to handle this topic. > > I suggest the name "rec.speeding". Two comments: 1. This would also be applicable to rec.auto 2. There is already a discussion in rec.auto which relates to the possible creation of rec.driving, which would make rec.speeding unnecessary. Randy Marks (UUCP) {decvax,ucbvax,allegra}!decwrl!ssdevo.enet!marks (INTERNET) marks@ssdevo.enet.dec.com (domain-based INTERNET) marks%ssdevo.enet@decwrl.dec.com ......................................................................... "Proper technique will get you through times of no strength better than strength will get you through times of bad technique." -- Fabulous Furry Freak Brothers .........................................................................