[sci.electronics] thermistors....

wern@utzoo.uucp (Wern Thiel) (05/27/90)

here is an exerpt from an article we published in
 ELECTRONICS TODAY  International  Nov.1980 p.71
under the title  USING THERMISTORS :






                 W. THIEL   J. MACHIN   AND   J. KORNATOWSKI

             Department of Zoology University of Toronto Toronto
                           Ontario M5S 1A1 Canada.


                           Abstract

                 A general  equation  describing  the  resistance-
            temperature    characteristics   of   thermistors   is
            presented together with a functional interpretation of
            two of its constants.  The use of the equation greatly
            simplifies   calibration   procedures   and   promotes
            increased  confidence  in inexpensive "wide tolerance"
            thermistors. 




Introduction



     Thermistors are temperature sensitive resistors usually with  a  negative
temperature  coefficient.  One of the advantages of using thermistors for tem-
perature measurement is their small size.  Another is that  small  temperature
changes cause considerable changes in their electrical resistance.  Apart from
the direct measurement of temperature they may be incorporated into electronic
circuits  as temperature compensating devices as well as forming the sensitive
elements in hygrometers, vacuum gauges, conductivity  cells  and  anemometers.
(Philips  Electron  Devices  1963;  Gulton Industries 1965; Mortimer and Moore
1970; Fenwal Electronics 1974).  Manufacturers typically supply  precalibrated
thermistors  as  well as less expensive types which have much wider tolerances
(to within  20% of nominal calibration).  The idea has grown up, that inexpen-
sive  thermistors  are  unreliable and require frequent and laborious calibra-
tion.  Our experience with the calibration and use of inexpensive  thermistors
in  biological research has removed much of this doubt and has lead to greater
confidence in a simplified calibration procedure.  This calibration  technique
together  with  some  practical consequences of a mathematical formulation for
the temperature-resistance relationship are described below.  It is hoped that
this  information  will encourage the design and use of inexpensive thermistor
instrumentation by the individual experimenter.  Those  who  employ  multiple,
readily  portable  remote  reading temperature measuring devices with a sensi-
tivity in the order of of 0.5 C would benefit most from the type of instrument
described.




     The  general  relationship  between  temperature  and  resistance  for  a
thermistor  is  given  by the following exponential equation (Philips Electron
Devices 1963)

                                  R = Ae(B)T     


     where R is resistance in ohms at temperature T.  T is the temperature  in
 C  and  e  the  base of natural logarithms.  Since R equals A at zero degrees
Celsius, A is the intercept and B is the slope in a semi-log plot given by

                               B = ln(R) -ln(A) /  T
                                        


     We had thought that inexpensive wide tolerance thermistors  would  follow
this  exponential  relationship  less closely.  This was found not to be true.
When comparing a large number of conventionally  obtained  calibration  curves
from  Philips  thermistors (type 205-CE/P2K2), we found that values for B were
remarkably consistent.  It was only coefficient  A  that  varied  considerably
between  individual thermistors.  It appears that B is related to the composi-
tion of the temperature sensitive material used in the  thermistor,  differing
only  slightly  within  each  type  and  even  less within one batch.  Since B
represents the slope it is also  an  indication  of  the  sensitivity  of  the
thermistor.   The value of A is a characteristic of each individual thermistor
and is therefore related to the nominal values  stated  by  the  manufacturer.
The  spread  in  A  for inexpensive thermistors may be as high as 20% but more
recent production technique or quality controls  have  resulted  in  generally
closer  tolerances.  It is now frequently possible to find matching pairs   in
a sample of ten.  Thermistors of the same material in many different  physical
configurations are available in a wide range of nominal values from a few ohms
to hundreds of thousands of ohms at room temperature.


Calibration

     Thermistors may be calibrated by mounting them in contact with  the  bulb
of an accurate  thermometer.  Calibration runs are most conveniently performed
by first packing the thermistors in ice chips and distilled  water  to  obtain
zero  C.  Higher temperatures are then obtained by stirring in various amounts
of warm water.  For the  present  purpose  thermistor  resistances  were  con-
veniently measured with a digital ohmmeter to the nearest ohm and temperatures
were measured to 0.1 C.  We have found that  satisfactory  calibration  curves
for   thermistors  can be obtained by simply determining thermistor resistance
at zero  C and at one other temperature preferably at the  other  end  of  the
temperature  range  of  interest  and  by  using Eq. (1) and Eq. (2).  In this
manner it is possible to derive calibration curves for any unknown thermistor.
Limited extrapolation to temperatures outside the calibrated range can be made
but possibly with increased error.  Comparisons of single resistance  measure-
ments can be confidently used to check for damage.  We have found that  undam-
aged thermistors used at biological temperatures do not change their  calibra-
tion  with  time.   Since  coefficient B varies slightly over wide temperature
ranges, more accurate calibrations may be performed at  several  temperatures.
In  this  case  a  somewhat  better overall fit to the calibration data can be
obtained with a computer least squares curve fitting  program  which  computes
the  best fit for an exponential equation to all the observed values.  Table 1
compares observed resistance with those predicted from a  computer  determined
curve  equation  based  on calibration measurements made at 10 C intervals and
with those predicted from a regression line between points  for  zero   C  and
50 C.   In  the  latter the log-linear calculations were performed on an elec-
tronic pocket calculator.  It can be seen that the errors in calculated resis-
tance  do  not  exceed  0.9%  in either case.  This is equivalent to a maximum
error of about 0.4 C.





TABLE 1

Discrepancies between observed and calculated resistances predicted
from Eq. (1) comparing the results from a computer program
using all temperature values and those from an electronic pocket
calculator using only two points (zero and 50C).



TEMPERATURE	ACTUAL	        COMPUTER	ERROR	POCKET	        ERROR
degree     	RESISTANCE	BEST FIT	%	CALCULATOR	%



0       	4036	        4013.93 	+0.6	4036	        +0.0
10	        2689	        2689.20	        +0.0	2704	        +0.5
20	        1792	        1800.82	        -0.4	1811	        +1.0
30	        1201	        1207.12	        -0.5	1214	        +1.0
40	         808	         808.35	        +0.0	 813	        +0.6
50	         545	         541.85	        +0.6	 545	        +0.0


Appendix I 

 Calculation

To calculate the parameters of a thermistor
that was measured at two points - zero degree
and 50 degrees. The resistance at zero was
4036 Ohms and the resistance at 50 degrees
was 545 Ohms.

First to calculate B
enter R		545
press ln x	6.30079
press minus
enter A		4036
press ln x	8.303
press equal	-2.00222
press divide
enter T		50
press equal	-.0400445 answer

Calculate resistance for 10 degrees
enter B		-.0400445
press multiply
enter T		10
press equal	-.4004447
press e (inverse ln x)
		.670022
press multiply
enter A		4036
press equal	2704 answer