[sci.electronics] Is microcoding passe' ?

rainer@boulder.Colorado.EDU (Rainer Malzbender) (05/14/91)

Short summary: can anyone suggest what might be used these days instead of
an AMD 2910 sequencer ?

Long summary:

As I was working on my latest hardware design, it became clear that it fit
perfectly into a classic microprogrammed architecture, with the difference
being that the execution unit is something weird (non-arithmetic).
Having used the 2901 stuff years ago, I called AMD and found out that this
is basically obsolete, and that "everyone's going to RISC". Well, that may
be swell, but I still need a microprogrammed sequencer. And I don't mean
the PAL versions, since I need something with a writable control store.

I'm getting some documentation from AMD on CMOS versions of the old 2900
series, but in the meantime I'm soliciting info from the net as to what
people are using these days. I'm looking for something like the 2910 which
supports at least a 4K microprogram memory, with a clock speed of at least
100 ns, preferably 50ns. Sorry, I can't reveal the application, but it
requires being able to generate lots of digital signals every 100 ns in
a programmable way. Obviously one alternative will be to use the 2910, but
there must be something niftier around by now. Thanks.

--
Rainer Malzbender                          Real programmers build hardware.
Dept. of Physics (303)492-6829 
U. of Colorado, Boulder         rainer@boulder.colorado.edu 128.138.240.246