11TSTARK@GALLUA.BITNET (Timothy Stark) (09/09/88)
Dear CP/M User: Last summer before our school started, I ported a file to MS-DOS diskette with my commodore 128 w/rfc512 disk drive using Trans-128 software. I formatted MS-DOS diskette on my commodore 128 and put a file into it. I returned back to school, I tried to dir my MSDOS disk on school's IBM PC. It worked fine. I tried to copy a file from commodore 128 to hard disk but it said me that sector not ready error. I tried another file to my MSDOS disk but copy slowed down much. What happened? I believed that trans-128 misplaced sector#/track# on all tracks that made MS-DOS system slowed down. Why? -- Tim Stark +=============================================================================+ | Timothy Stark | BitNet: 11TSTARK@GALLUA.BITNET | | Gallaudet University | Internet: 11TSTARK%GALLUA.BITNET@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU | | P.O. Box 1453 | UUCP: ...!psuvax1!gallua.bitnet!11tstark | | Washington, DC. 20002 | CSNET: 11TSTARK%GALLUA.BITNET@RELAY.CS.NET | | USA | QLink: TimS18 | +=============================================================================+ "The deaf people called the only university for the deaf."
cww@ndmath.UUCP (Clarence W. Wilkerson) (09/10/88)
My guess, not having Commodore equipment is that the PC disks you formatted on the Commodore had a built in skew factor. That is is, that the order of the physical sectors was not the order of the logical sectors. Many cp/m systems did this for dd rather than use a software sectoring skew as on the 8" sd format. However, on a standard PC disk, the order of the physical sectors is 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 9 whereas on your
tse@pbhyd.PacBell.COM (Tom Edwards) (09/13/88)
In article <8809091315.AA11136@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> 11TSTARK@GALLUA.BITNET (Timothy Stark) writes: > > Last summer before our school started, I ported a file to MS-DOS diskette > with my commodore 128 w/rfc512 disk drive using Trans-128 software. I > formatted MS-DOS diskette on my commodore 128 and put a file into it. > I am new to CPM, how do I get a copy of trans128. Thanks for your replies, Tom