dg@pallio.UUCP (David Goodenough) (09/18/90)
Ian, Firstly, can you get me an E-mail address that won't bounce: sactoh0 keep sending back stuff addressed to sctoh0!ijsys!ianj, it looks like the sactoh0!ijsys link is down: I've tried sending this five times now, and it keeps bouncing (see below). --- cut here --- cut here --- cut here --- cut here --- cut here --- >From xait!think!ames!pacbell!sactoh0!uucp Tue Sep 18 08:16:51 1990 Received: by pallio.UUCP (CP/M MAIL V2.1b) id XX00011d21; Tue, 18 Sep 90 08:16:51 EDT Received: from think.UUCP by XAIT.Xerox.COM with UUCP; Tue, 18 Sep 90 07:44:29 -0400 Received: from mail.think.com by Early-Bird.Think.COM; Tue, 18 Sep 90 07:32:06 EDT Return-Path: <pacbell!sactoh0!uucp@ames.UUCP> Received: from Gateway.Think.COM by mail.think.com; Tue, 18 Sep 90 07:32:14 -0400 Received: from ames.arc.nasa.gov by gateway.think.com (5.61/Think-1.0C) id AA07333; Tue, 18 Sep 90 07:32:10 -0400 Received: by ames.arc.nasa.gov (5.64/1.2); Tue, 18 Sep 90 04:32:05 -0700 Received: by sactoh0.SAC.CA.US (smail2.5) id AA00966; 17 Sep 90 23:47:05 PDT (Mon) Subject: Warning From uucp Message-Id: <9009172347.AA00966@sactoh0.SAC.CA.US> Date: 17 Sep 90 23:47:05 PDT (Mon) >From: xait!think!ames!sactoh0.SAC.CA.US!uucp (UNIX-to-UNIX Calling PROGRAM Admin) To: pacbell!ames!think!xait!pallio!dg We have been unable to contact machine 'ijsys' since you queued your job. ijsys!mail ianj (Date 09/16) The job will be deleted in several days if the problem is not corrected. If you care to kill the job, execute the following command: uustat -kijsysN20bf Sincerely, sactoh0!uucp ############################################# ##### Data File: ############################ >From pacbell!ames!think!xait!pallio!dg Sun Sep 16 18:48:03 1990 remote from sactoh0 Received: by sactoh0.SAC.CA.US (smail2.5) id AA19823; 16 Sep 90 18:48:03 PDT (Sun) Received: by ames.arc.nasa.gov (5.64/1.2); Sat, 15 Sep 90 18:38:53 -0700 Received: from xait.UUCP by Early-Bird.Think.COM; Sat, 15 Sep 90 20:48:07 EDT Received: from pallio.UUCP by XAIT.Xerox.COM with UUCP; Sat, 15 Sep 90 20:16:23 -0400 Received: by pallio.UUCP (CP/M MAIL V2.1b) id XX00011cfd; Sat, 15 Sep 90 18:37:00 EDT To: think!ames!pacbell!sactoh0!ijsys!ianj Subject: Timer patches >From: ames!think!xait!pallio!dg (David Goodenough) Date: Sat, 15 Sep 90 18:37:00 EDT Message-Id: <XX00011cfd@pallio.UUCP> Ian, > I got the latest version of UUCP, and I have a small problem with > the timer overlay I wrote. ..... > ..... but they act as if the routines weren't there to begin with. The one possible cause is the value in HL when you return from the timer patch. The code that calls the timer code expects HL to be zero on return. If it's non-zero, then the programs assume an error, and don't use the patch value, and prompt anyway. I don't know if this is the case, but it's the only thing I can think of. Check what is happening, and let me know. Yours, -- dg@pallio.UUCP - David Goodenough +---+ IHS | +-+-+ ..... !harvard!xait!pallio!dg +-+-+ | AKA: dg%pallio.uucp@xait.xerox.com +---+