nomad@mist.UUCP (12/08/87)
We are in the process of converting our entire network to NAMED. I was wondering if any one out there had a NAMED (BIND?) running on HP-UX 5.17 and/or HP-UX 5.5 . Of course, it would help if they had the resolver code in use for gethostbyname, etc. - to take advantage of the nameservice. Does anyone know if it will be included in HP-UX 6.0? (HP, are you listening?) nomad ------------------------- LEE DAMON FidoNet: 152/201 (The Castle) - (503) 757-8841 nomad Internet: nomad@cs.orst.edu UUCP : {hp-pcd,tektronix}!orstcs!nomad "Say what you like, the bicycle has a great past ahead of it!"
jin@hplabsz.HPL.HP.COM (Tai Jin) (12/08/87)
Regarding BIND (Domain Name service) for HP-UX. Contact me (tai@atom.hpl.hp.com) for an unsupported copy. ...tai
daver@hpindda.HP.COM (Dave Richards) (12/09/87)
> We are in the process of converting our entire network to NAMED. I was >wondering if any one out there had a NAMED (BIND?) running on HP-UX 5.17 >and/or HP-UX 5.5 . Of course, it would help if they had the resolver code >in use for gethostbyname, etc. - to take advantage of the nameservice. > Does anyone know if it will be included in HP-UX 6.0? (HP, are you listening?) The answer I'm going to give you is not what you want to hear, I'm afraid. No, HP does not ship a version of BIND with any release of HP-UX nor will it be available with 6.0 (HP 9000/300) or 2.0 (9000/800). In reality many of us are running this code on these machines and are trying to get enough interest within the appropriate group to make it a deliverable product. However, we are a market-driven organization, and (unfortunately) the customer demand for BIND has not been that great. Dave Richards - HP Information Networks Division
nomad@mist.cs.orst.edu (Lee Vincent Damon) (12/10/87)
(I tried to mail this to you, but the nameserver couldn't find any ref's to hpindda.HP.COM, including an MX record.) In article <4310003@hpindda.HP.COM> you write: >The answer I'm going to give you is not what you want to hear, I'm afraid. >No, HP does not ship a version of BIND with any release of HP-UX nor will it >be available with 6.0 (HP 9000/300) or 2.0 (9000/800). ..... >However, we are a market-driven organization, and (unfortunately) the >customer demand for BIND has not been that great. > > Dave Richards - HP Information Networks Division Consider the customer demand for BIND to be bumped by 12 computers (at least) at this site. Anyway, if they don't start supporting BIND in the near future, they will find themselves out in the wind on the Internet. When the SRI-NIC static host table goes away, so will any machine that can't use a nameserver. I know that if I were specifying a machine, I would *require* nameservice along with the other BSDisms (finger, talk, RCP, etc) that make a networked environment "worthwhile." (Don't trust the header at the top of this, use the below address(es)) nomad ------------------------- LEE DAMON FidoNet: 152/201 (The Castle) - (503) 757-8841 nomad@cs.orst.edu Internet: nomad@cs.orst.edu UUCP : {hp-pcd,tektronix}!orstcs!nomad "Say what you like, the bicycle has a great past ahead of it!"