jeffh@weycord.WEYCO.COM (05/26/88)
How about a new subject:
comp.os.osf
-and/or-
comp.std.osf
This would be a GREAT way for people on the NET to sound out a little!!!
We might even contribute in some small way...
Jeff Harrell
hpubvwa!weycord!jeffh
(206) 927-9268andrea@hp-sdd.HP.COM (Andrea K. Frankel) (05/28/88)
In article <6430012@weycord.WEYCO.COM> jeffh@weycord.WEYCO.COM writes: >How about a new subject: > > comp.os.osf > -and/or- > comp.std.osf > >This would be a GREAT way for people on the NET to sound out a little!!! >We might even contribute in some small way... contribute away. Comp.std.misc doesn't get too much traffic, and there's no reason why it couldn't be used for OSF! Andrea Frankel, Hewlett-Packard (San Diego Division) (619) 592-4664 "...I brought you a paddle for your favorite canoe." ______________________________________________________________________________ UUCP : {hplabs|nosc|hpfcla|ucsd}!hp-sdd!andrea Internet : andrea%hp-sdd@hpcea.ce.hp.com (or @nosc.mil, @ucsd.edu) CSNET : andrea%hp-sdd@hplabs.csnet USnail : 16399 W. Bernardo Drive, San Diego CA 92127-1899 USA
jeffh@weycord.WEYCO.COM (06/03/88)
>contribute away. Comp.std.misc doesn't get too much traffic, and >there's no reason why it couldn't be used for OSF! Comp.std.misc sounds like a good place for the 217/237 standard or the hp150 standard- not osf! If OSF isn't a lot of marketing BS it otta get better than "misc". DISCLAMER: It's a fact- I think?? Jeff ( Spectra Software ) Harrell hpubvwa!weycord!jeffh (206) 927-9268