taylor@limbo.Intuitive.Com (Dave Taylor) (10/16/89)
Hi there. If you're an HP employee who has been recently declared as "excess", or if you know of someone at Hewlett-Packard who has, I would like to hear from you. I am, as most of you probably know, associated with "The HP Chronicle", the premier source of HP-related news outside of HP, and I'm interested in writing an article or two about what's currently going on there at Hewlett-Packard. My understanding of the "excess" program is that a select number of people in the company (around 10%?) have been declared as 'non-essential to the running and success of the specific department or division' (or "excess") and are then given anywhere from 2 to 4 months to look through the LOIS on-line job listing system to find a new position within HP. If there are no positions of interest, once the period has expired the immediate manager then picks a job for the excessed employee, and if they don't like it, they are expected to quit HP entirely. The further wrinkle is that when you're looking for a position within HP you can talk to any group at all (that's hiring and has requisitions), but once you formally interview with a group, if they offer you the position you are *required* to accept it. Is this correct? Is there anyone there at HP that would like to comment on the accuracy of the policy I've stated above? If you've been declared excess, also, I would be most interested in hearing about your sentiments and feelings on the issue; answering with a request that it be anonymous is perfectly fine (given the situation, it would be a surprise if you wanted to have your name known). If you're interested in assisting in this, answering the following questions would be most useful: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EXCESS HP EMPLOYEE QUESTIONNAIRE Respond to "taylor@limbo.intuitive.com" - name (optional), department, and division, including location - years with HP, and positions held during that time (optional) - do you mind having your name associated with your answers? - how did you hear about the 'excess' policies? - how did you hear that YOU are considered 'excess'? - how do you feel about it? - are there aspects of the policy that you don't understand? - when where you told you were "excess"? - How long have you been given to look for a new position within HP? - do you view this as a form of layoff? Why or why not? - how much time have you spent looking for a new position within HP? - what percentage of time do you anticipate spending in the next few months looking within HP? Outside of HP? - do you believe HP management is supporting you while you search for a new position? If not, what aren't they doing? - at a higher level, do you think this "excess" policy is necessary for HP given their current financial state? Why or why not? - how has the hiring freeze impacted your feelings, loyalty, and views of Hewlett-Packard? - how do you think it will affect the industry perspective of HP as "the one company that never has layoffs"? - do you feel that the right groups have been targeted for "excess"? (keep in mind that one goal is to not adversely impact the longer term viability of the research, development, marketing and sales of the HP product line) - If you were capable of choosing which groups should have to dramatically cut their budgets, which would YOU choose, and why? (for example, it's not unreasonable to say that, given the amount of money HP spends on their marketing groups, the company has the lowest profile and worst image in the biz...) - Are you considering leaving HP because of this new policy? - What companies have you been considering? - What companies might you consider in the near future, as your search perhaps proves to be fruitless? - How do you feel this will impact HP in the short and longer term, especially in the competitive markets of desktop computer workstations, minicomputers, personal computer peripherals, calculators and medical equipment? - Are there big issues about this that I've missed in these questions? What are they and how do you feel about them? Thank you very much for answering these questions! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Please do NOT respond via HP Notes or netnews -- responses via electronic mail to "taylor@limbo.intuitive.com" or "hplabs!decwrl!limbo!taylor" will be much preferred, and again, please indicate if you'd like your responses to remain anonymous. I do *not* plan on summarizing responses to the net either, so you can be assured that if you want to be anonymous, you will be very anonymous! Thanks for your help and I sincerely hope this period of darkness at HP quickly clears away!! -- Dave Taylor Intuitive Systems Unix Editor Mountain View, California "The HP Chronicle" taylor@limbo.intuitive.com or {uunet!}{decwrl,apple}!limbo!taylor
human@hpindda.HP.COM (Aaron Schuman) (10/17/89)
Dave's statement contains several significant errors of fact. Please don't view it as some kind of "inside scoop". Instead, view it as a journalist's wrong guesses. Aaron Schuman
tsu@hpcupt1.HP.COM (Stanley Tsu) (10/17/89)
Hi Dave, For matters like this, you should contact Corporate Public Relations. I don't have the phone number handy. Directory Assistance should be able to tell you, but if not, send me e-mail and I'll help. I'd like to add that, IMHO, using technical forums, such as comp.sys.hp, to discuss rumors and innuendos shows incredibly bad taste. Stanley Tsu Hewlett-Packard tsu@hp-ses.hp.com #include <std/disclaimer.h>
fkittred@bbn.com (Fletcher Kittredge) (10/17/89)
flame warning
In article <152@limbo.Intuitive.Com> taylor@limbo.Intuitive.Com (Dave Taylor) writes:
...various non-technical garbage...
This message abuses the spirit of the rules governing posting to an
usenet technical group. Rumor mongering has a dedicated group,
talk.rumors. Kindly take this junque there.
Fletcher E. Kittredge fkittred@bbn.com
taylor@limbo.Intuitive.Com (Dave Taylor) (10/20/89)
This note is an apology to the people of HP and related about my recent survey of "HP people declared 'excess'". I have discussed the matter with HP Corporate Public Relations and am chagrined to admit that there are some significant factual errors in the original posting. A brief explanation is that many of my friends at HP have either left or are looking for new positions due to the "excess" policy, so I kind of let my emotions run away with me a bit. By no means is HP going through what I described as "dark times" -- in fact HP is faring quite well in what is currently a fairly soft computer market. I shall shortly be receiving further information from HP PR about the actual policy and at that point shall post a more informative response about what's going on. If you would rather not read about it here in this forum, but are interested, drop me a note to ensure I email you a copy; I might well decide not to further clutter this group with more inappropriate postings. *sigh* as if the earthquake wasn't enough... Again, apologies for the original article. -- Dave Taylor Intuitive Systems Mountain View, California taylor@limbo.intuitive.com or {uunet!}{decwrl,apple}!limbo!taylor