lrb@rrivax.rri.uwo.ca (Lance R. Bailey) (07/25/90)
my 9000/540 replacement must have native tcp/ip support. the 822 is one of the candidates and it even has a bind implementation. does any one out there use it? how good is it. _________________________________ Lance R. Bailey, Systems Manager | Robarts Research Institute email: lrb@rri.uwo.ca | Clinical Trials Resources Group vox: 519-663-3787 ext. 4108 | P.O. Box 5015, 100 Perth Dr. fax: 519-663-3789 | London, Canada N6A 5K8
harkin@hpindda.HP.COM (Art Harkin) (07/27/90)
> lrb@rrivax.rri.uwo.ca (Lance R. Bailey) ... > > my 9000/540 replacement must have native tcp/ip support. the 822 is > one of the candidates and it even has a bind implementation. does > any one out there use it? how good is it. If you are talking about the nameserver (DNS) capability, HP-UX implements BIND, Berkeley's (BSD 4.3) version of a domain name server. Thus it is a widely used version, and cleanly implemented (ie. there is no need to run Yellow Pages if you do not want to, unlike another vendor). Art Harkin Hewlett Packard
cricket@hpcc01.HP.COM (Jiminy Cricket) (07/28/90)
my 9000/540 replacement must have native tcp/ip support. the 822 is
one of the candidates and it even has a bind implementation. does any
one out there use it? how good is it.
Well, I've run the Series 800 named for HP-UX 7.0 on my 835 and it's one of
the more robust, better-behaved versions I've seen.
But then my opinion could hardly be called unbiased...
cricket
hostmaster@hp.com