[comp.sys.mac] APL.68000 information request

kim@amdahl.UUCP (05/07/87)

[ For all you do ... this line's for you ... ]

I recently received a brochure from Spencer Organization, Inc. for a
product called "APL.68000" (in response to my having circled a number
on the bingo card in Computer Language magazine).

Though I am specifically interested in the Amiga version, I'm cross
posting this to all the comp.sys.groups that cover machines for which
the product is available (Amiga, Mac, AtariST, and PClone).  BTW, the
PClone version comes with a 68K board, and is called MultiAPL.

Has anybody had any experience with APL.68000 [or MultiAPL], or with
Spencer Organization, Inc?  The brochure says APL.68000 is a trademark
of MicroAPL Ltd.  Are these folks in Great Britain, or ...?

I've always wanted to play with APL since college [no "language wars",
please], and am wondering if this package would be worthwhile.  It seems
to be a pretty complete implementation from the (meager) information in
their literature, and does provide interfaces to the graphics facilities,
serial ports, windows/menus/etc. on all supported machines.

Two concerns on the Amiga implementation ... dunno if multitasking is
supported (no mention), and don't know if access to the native file system
is provided (mentioned for all *other* implementations).

They are asking $295 ($995 for PClones, w/68K board), and have a 30-day
money back guarantee, which seems in-line with (Amiga) compiler prices.

Any info would be appreciated; I'll summarize any email responses that I
receive to the net.

Thanks!
/kim


-- 
UUCP:  kim@amdahl.amdahl.com
  or:  {sun,decwrl,hplabs,pyramid,ihnp4,seismo,oliveb,cbosgd}!amdahl!kim
DDD:   408-746-8462
USPS:  Amdahl Corp.  M/S 249,  1250 E. Arques Av,  Sunnyvale, CA 94086
CIS:   76535,25

[  Any thoughts or opinions which may or may not have been expressed  ]
[  herein are my own.  They are not necessarily those of my employer. ]

ward@chinet.UUCP (05/14/87)

If you are only interested in "hacking", and have access to a PC or would
consider a clone (you WERE considering a board for a PC, no?), might
I recommend STSC APL?  It costs $595 (list), but they have a version
minus the full-screen editor and a few other things, called "Pocket APL".
  STSC is an EXCELLENT company, good products, good support.
  800-592-0050 (Rockville MD)

graifer@net1.ucsd.edu (Dan Graifer) (05/15/87)

In article <1021@chinet.UUCP> ward@chinet.UUCP (Ward Christensen-) writes:
>If you are only interested in "hacking", and have access to a PC or would
>consider a clone (you WERE considering a board for a PC, no?), might
>I recommend STSC APL?  It costs $595 (list), but they have a version
>minus the full-screen editor and a few other things, called "Pocket APL".
>  STSC is an EXCELLENT company, good products, good support.
>  800-592-0050 (Rockville MD)


STSC APL*PLUS/PC is an excellent product, except for one drawback.  Because
of the brain damaged segment register architecture of the intel processors,
there is a 64Kbyte size limit on all objects(vars or fns).  For floating 
point numbers, that is 8K numbers max per object.  I believe that, to keep the 
interpreter size down, the also make no storage distinction between boolean and 
integer data.  Since I believe it uses 4 byte integers, booleans can have at 
most 16K elements.  This is most limiting when doing things like string 
searches.  Fortunately, they provide a quad-ss system function to do this.

I have the first release of the APL*PLUS/Mac system.  Still a few minor 
problems in the first release, but very fast. Uses as much memory as you've
got.  (I've got 1MB, I have friends with 4MB).  I've created variables with
100,000 integer elements.  Used Domino to do OLS on 2200 cases of 20 variables
(ie y <domino> x, where x has 44000 floating point elements). You can't do 
that on any PC/clone.
                              Dan Graifer
                              graifer@net1.UCSD.EDU
Disclaimer: Nobody ever listens to me anyways; Why should they start now?

ljdickey@water.UUCP (05/16/87)

I have just returned from APL87 held this past week in Dallas.  Both
companies, Spencer Organization and STSC, were had booths in the
exhibit area.  I agree with comments made previously that STSC has an
excellent product and would add that APL.68000 is also an excellent
product.  Timing tests may sometines be deceiving, but I mention
that on some tests, APL.68000 on the Mac is about 5 times as fast as
STSC's APL*PLUS on the Mac.

The reason for the speed of the APL.68000 is that it is written in hand
crafted assembly code.  A very nice advantage, indeed.  This product
has been around for several years, and has most of the bugs shaken out
of it by now.  (You might have seen it on Wycat for instance.)  The
major marketing thrust now is for the Atari ST, the Mac, and the
Commodore Amiga and the ports wore done in that order.  Hence, claim
the developers, the Amiga version has the best interface of the three.

One representative from STSC claims that they have uniformity across
different versions.  Among others, they offer versions for the Sun, the
IBM PC, and for the Apple Macintosh.  The Mac version seems to be descended
from a product called PortaAPL, previously of Cambridge, Massachussets.
Since STSC claims now to have uniformity, it looks to me as though they
bought the Mac interface and the customer base and plans to expand on
that.

In recent years, STSC has brought many developments to APL, including
nested arrays.  Maybe these things will be coming to to the micro
versions.  The company provides excellent user support.

-- 
 L. J. Dickey, Faculty of Mathematics, University of Waterloo. 
 ljdickey@water.UUCP    ljdickey%water@waterloo.CSNET
 ljdickey%water%waterloo.csnet@csnet-relay.ARPA
 ljdickey@watdcs.BITNET		UUCP: ...!watmath!water!ljdickey

bchso@uhnix2.UUCP (Dan Davison) (05/18/87)

In article <3172@sdcsvax.UCSD.EDU> graifer@net1.UUCP (Dan Graifer) writes:
>STSC APL*PLUS/PC is an excellent product, except for one drawback.  Because
>of the brain damaged segment register architecture of the intel processors,
>there is a 64Kbyte size limit on all objects(vars or fns).   
>                              Dan Graifer

Not any more.  Version 6.3 ('m not sure about 5.X versions) now support 
objects greater than 64K.  Amazingly enough, the speed does not seem to
be changed much...although I added a V20 and an 8087 at the same time.
BTW, updates and patches are FREE from the STSC bulletin bboard.  I upgraded
from 6.0 to 6.3 for about $5.00 in phone calls.