rs4u+@ANDREW.CMU.EDU (Richard Siegel) (06/22/87)
I was just thinking.... (no smart remarks please).. what will the next generation of Macintosh be named? I think that after the disaster of the Apple III, that Macintosh III might have a stigma attached to it. Any suggestions? "Macintosh 030"? :-) --Rich
spector@acf3.NYU.EDU (David HM Spector) (06/22/87)
No, no no...its got to be a Macintosh II+, or maybe even a Macintosh IIe.. I wouldn't name _anything_ after the AppleIII, not that the AppleIII was such a bad machine...it wasn't, but the Titanic wasn't such a bad ship either! 1/2 :-} David Spector Senior Systems Programmer GBA Computer Center, NYU Spector@kl.gba.nyu.edu Spector@NYU
tecot@apple.UUCP (Ed Tecot) (06/23/87)
In article <IUrGzGy00WI8zYk1sn@andrew.cmu.edu> rs4u+@ANDREW.CMU.EDU (Richard Siegel) writes: > >I was just thinking.... (no smart remarks please).. what will the next >generation of Macintosh be named? I think that after the disaster of the >Apple III, that Macintosh III might have a stigma attached to it. > >Any suggestions? "Macintosh 030"? :-) > > --Rich Macintosh IV, followed by Macintosh VIII, followed by Macintosh XVI :-) _emt