[comp.sys.mac] Adobe font license agreement

paul@aucs.UUCP (Paul Steele) (08/06/87)

I am posting this message on behalf of a professor in our French
department.  He has recently purchased Adobe's Sonata font for use
with a laser printer.  The license agreement states that it can only
be used on one laser printer.  I guess that this is done by naming
the laser printer and initializing the font in some manner.  If the
implications are correct, this is completely unacceptable to him.  He
does not own a laser printer himself, so he would have to choose one
of the campus printers for his font, and then would be unable to use
the software on any other printer, either at out university or someplace
else.  The installation instuctions state that if the installed printer
breaks down and requires a new motherboard, the end-user must submit
a bill of repairs to varify that the font installation has been lost
and they will then send you a new master disk so the font can be reinstalled
on the new motherboard.

Is this for real?  He doesn't want to install the font until he fully
understands the implications of the license.  Has anyone had any experience
with Adobe fonts they would like to share?


Paul H. Steele      UUCP:      {seismo|watmath|utai|garfield}!dalcs!aucs!Paul
Acadia University   BITNET:    {Paul|phs}@Acadia
Wolfville, NS       Internet:  {Paul|phs}%Acadia.BITNET@WISCVM.WISC.EDU
CANADA  B0P 1X0     PHONEnet:  (902) 542-2201x587

chuq%plaid@Sun.COM (Chuq Von Rospach) (08/06/87)

>Is this for real?  He doesn't want to install the font until he fully
>understands the implications of the license.  Has anyone had any experience
>with Adobe fonts they would like to share?

Yup.  Adobe has one of the nastiest copy protection schemes I've seen on the
Mac, and are one of the few companies left that won't even reconsider their
stance on copy protection.  This is the only reason why I, and many people I
know, won't even consider buying an Adobe font, even though they've got some
faces I'd kill to get my hands on.  As long as the copy protection exists, I
won't touch them and won't recommend them.

(and yes, the copy protection is LW specific and does require a new master
disk if you have to get your LW repaired, and I know at least half a dozen
horror stories surrounding this little feature).

Sigh.

chuq
Chuq Von Rospach	chuq@sun.COM		Delphi: CHUQ

We live and learn, but not the wiser grow -- John Pomfret (1667-1"

S

korn@cory.Berkeley.EDU (Peter "Arrgh" Korn) (08/07/87)

In <402@aucs.UUCP>, paul@aucs.UUCP (Paul Steele) said:  

>...[discusses the Adobe 'one printer' font liscense, and asks "is this true?"]

I agree completely with Chuq on this one--it's one of the nastiest copy
protections out there, impossible (so far as I've found) to defeat, and 
just generally downright obnoxious.

If you do need a font made my Adobe, there is something of a work-around.
You can purchase a 'multiple-printer' copy of the font, for 3x the amount
of the 'single-printer' copy.

Meanwhile, there are always the Cassady laser fonts (not quite as clean,
but much less expensive, and not copy-protected in any way).

Peter
--
Peter "Arrgh" Korn
korn@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU
{decvax,dual,hplabs,sdcsvax,ulysses}!ucbvax!korn

jtyd@ur-tut.UUCP (Ty Dibble) (08/10/87)

In article <20009@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> korn@cory.Berkeley.EDU.UUCP (Peter "Arrgh" Korn) writes:
>In <402@aucs.UUCP>, paul@aucs.UUCP (Paul Steele) said:  
>
>>...[discusses the Adobe 'one printer' font liscense, and asks "is this true?"]
>
>I agree completely with Chuq on this one--it's one of the nastiest copy
>protections out there, impossible (so far as I've found) to defeat, and 
>
>If you do need a font made my Adobe, there is something of a work-around.

According to a phone call I made to Adobe about 2 months ago, the single
font cost was $185.00, and the multiple-printer version (read 5 printers)
was $375.00.  For use in a large institutional setting, the multiple 
printer arrangement is the only satisfactory answer.  It would probably not
be reasonable/economic for a single user in that environment (even if it
were not copy prevented).

>Meanwhile, there are always the Cassady laser fonts (not quite as clean,
>but much less expensive, and not copy-protected in any way).

J Ty Dibble - JTYD at the University of Rochester

edwards@bgsuvax.UUCP (Bruce Edwards) (08/11/87)

In article <20009@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>, korn@cory.Berkeley.EDU (Peter "Arrgh" Korn) writes:
> In <402@aucs.UUCP>, paul@aucs.UUCP (Paul Steele) said:  
> 
> >...[discusses the Adobe 'one printer' font liscense, and asks "is this true?"]
> 
> I agree completely with Chuq on this one--it's one of the nastiest copy
> protections out there, impossible (so far as I've found) to defeat, and 
> just generally downright obnoxious.
> 
> If you do need a font made my Adobe, there is something of a work-around.
> You can purchase a 'multiple-printer' copy of the font, for 3x the amount
> of the 'single-printer' copy.
> 
> Meanwhile, there are always the Cassady laser fonts (not quite as clean,
> but much less expensive, and not copy-protected in any way).
> 
> Peter
> --
> Peter "Arrgh" Korn
> korn@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU
> {decvax,dual,hplabs,sdcsvax,ulysses}!ucbvax!korn

Agreed that the font license problem with ADOBE fonts is a major hassle,
but converting the Merc font library to PostScript is a awesome task which
required a great deal of artistic, and creative input (translate not easily
automated and extremely time consuming). Without the guarantee of a return
on that investment there would simply not be as many fonts to chose from and
not nearly the quality. Quality in this case is not something as easy to
appreciate at 300 dpi as it is at 2540 dpi. Just so you know I'm not being
insensitive to the pain of the situation, we have a RIP (Raster Image
Processor) tied to Linotype L300 imagesetter. Because of board problems
and imcompetent or lets be kind poorly prepared service personel, we have
had to have the RedStone board replaced in the RIP 13 times...that's right,
13 times. RIP began to mean "Rest in Peace" around here! In fact the artists
made a small grave yard mural above the machine in which they would paste
little tombstones with the board replacement date inscribed whenever the Lino-
tron serviceman came with our next board. In each case ADOBE replaced our fonts
including the backup disks which you are intitled to if you send the card in
which comes with the master set. We have over 30 ADOBE fonts! Let's see that's
30 X 13 X 2 =..... an extremely tiring process. Each set must be reinit'ed and
installed on the RIP harddisk. One would think that you could transfer the
ID PROM to the next board, but far be it from me to meddle (its under a service
contract ...better they screw it up). Anyway...that's just the way it is. I
went out to ADOBE last year to take their PostScript driver classes and ask the
same questions that your asking. After seeing the font design studio and
watching the labor that goes into a single character the stiff copy protection
is understanding....not pleasant...but understandable. The Sonata font which
was mentioned in another article is a unique, significant, and beautiful font
which ought to be protected (if you're listening Cleo...nice work). Anyway,
nuff said.

      'These are only the shadowlands.' C.S. Lewis 
      ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
        CSNET: edwards@bgsu
      ARPANET: edwards%bgsu@csnet-relay
         UUCP: cbosgd!osu-eddie!bgsuvax!edwards
      ----------------------------------------------
      US Mail: Ken Jenkins c/o
               Century Marketing Corp.
               12836 S. Dixie Hwy.
               Bowling Green, OH. 43402

      (800) 537-9429 or (419) 354-2591
      ----------------------------------------------

chuq%plaid@Sun.COM (Chuq Von Rospach) (08/11/87)

>> I agree completely with Chuq on this one--it's one of the nastiest copy
>> protections out there, impossible (so far as I've found) to defeat, and 
>> just generally downright obnoxious.

Interesting coincidence.  I read in Publish! last night that Adobe is
dropping copy protection on their fonts (it was one of these "of course you
already know this, but..." comments stuck in the middle of an article).
Since this is the first I've heard of this, I'm wondering is Publish! is
dreaming, or whether Adobe really is dropping protection and I just haven't
heard.  Can anyone (especially from adobe?) confirm or deny this rumor?

chuq
Chuq Von Rospach	chuq@sun.COM		Delphi: CHUQ

We live and learn, but not the wiser grow -- John Pomfret (1667-17os k

alan@pdn.UUCP (08/14/87)

In article <402@aucs.UUCP> paul@aucs.UUCP (Paul Steele) writes:
>I am posting this message on behalf of a professor in our French
>department.  He has recently purchased Adobe's Sonata font for use
>with a laser printer.  The license agreement states that it can only
>be used on one laser printer.  I guess that this is done by naming
>...[deleted]
>Paul H. Steele      UUCP:      {seismo|watmath|utai|garfield}!dalcs!aucs!Paul
>Acadia University   BITNET:    {Paul|phs}@Acadia
>Wolfville, NS       Internet:  {Paul|phs}%Acadia.BITNET@WISCVM.WISC.EDU
>CANADA  B0P 1X0     PHONEnet:  (902) 542-2201x587

I developed an IBM-PC font initialization/installation program for Adobe
Fonts while I was working for ScenicSoft in Seattle.  This work was done
under contract to Adobe Systems.  Of course, I cannot comment on the
technical details of the copy-protection scheme that Adobe insisted on
incorporating into the product--besides, the Mac version may be somewhat
different.  However, we at ScenicSoft told Adobe repeatedly that their
customers would complain.  The case of customers who don't even own a
laser printer never occured to us.  But the problem of broken, stolen,
"repaired", upgraded, destroyed or adulterated laser printers is
obvious.  There is also the problem of customers who own multiple
printers--for which Adobe has a solution (?):  font Master Disks that
allow the customer to "initialize" fonts for upto 5 printers
simultaneously.  Such multi-printer font packages cost more, of course.
Perhaps the professor should consider purchasing one of these (I realize
that this is not the optimum solution).  It could be that Adobe, who
gets some (if not all) of their fonts from third parties, is REQUIRED
by circumstances beyond their control to impose such onerous protection
mechanisms on their fonts.

--Alan

verber%tut.cis.ohio-state.edu@osu-eddie.UUCP (Mark A. Verber) (08/17/87)

I could be wrong, but I am under the impression that the copy protection
scheme that Adobe is currently using will be dropped in the near future.
This is most likely due to Adobe being responsive to the needs and desires
of their customers.  If this is true, I am much more likely to buy a few
typefaces that I like.  I haven't up till now because I don't own my
own laser writer and switch between a number of different printers.
Anyone from Adobe want to comment?

Cheers,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Computer Science Department			         Mark A. Verber
The Ohio State University			 verber@ohio-state.arpa
+1 (614) 292-7344				cbosgd!osu-eddie!verber

brail@topaz.rutgers.edu (Greg Brail) (08/17/87)

At the MacWorld show, Adobe announced that they changed their font license
agreement. All new Adobe fonts will be shipped unprotected. If you purchased
an Adobe font less than 90 days ago, you can call them (1-800-29-ADOBE) and ask
for an unprotected version for free. If it was more than 90 days, you have to
pay about $50.

Personally, I'm glad they unprotected the fonts. Whether charging $50 to do so
is fair is a different matter however.

					-Greg
-- 
Greg Brail						UniPress Software
UUCP: {everywhere}!rutgers!topaz.rutgers.edu!brail	Work: (201)985-8000
New-style domain stuff: brail@topaz.rutgers.edu		Home: (201)846-3013

lsr@apple.UUCP (08/18/87)

According to the premier issue of Macintosh Today, Adobe is dropping copy
protection on their downloadable PostScript fonts.  The article says that
this announcement was supposed to be made at MacWorld Expo along with 6 new
typeface families.

BTW, Macintosh Today is the new Macintosh weekly, which premiered at
MacWorld.  

-- 
Larry Rosenstein

Object Specialist
Apple Computer

AppleLink: Rosenstein1
UUCP:  {sun, voder, nsc, mtxinu, dual}!apple!lsr
CSNET: lsr@Apple.com

jww@sdcsvax.UCSD.EDU (Joel West) (08/19/87)

I saw it in a ppress release in one of the other trade journals.
-- 
	Joel West  (c/o UCSD)
	Palomar Software, Inc., P.O. Box 2635, Vista, CA  92083
	{ucbvax,ihnp4}!sdcsvax!jww 	jww@sdcsvax.ucsd.edu
   or	ihnp4!crash!palomar!joel	joel@palomar.cts.com