brian@ut-sally.UUCP (Brian H. Powell) (11/19/87)
I just got around to installing LSC 2.13 from the upgrade sent to
sumex-aim. I recompiled a major project just for grins. My compile gave me
an error: it couldn't find the constant "iPFMaxPgs" (which is a constant that
specifies the maximum number of pages that can be spooled. See the Print
Manager chapter of IM.)
I looked at PrintMgr.h, and found "iPfMaxPgs" at the end of the file.
The question is:
Has Inside Mac Volume V renamed the constant so that "iPfMaxPgs" is
correct, or did THINK goof and accidentally rename it incorrectly?
If it's the former, is it my imagination, or has Apple abandoned their
casing scheme?
Brian H. Powell
UUCP: ...!uunet!ut-sally!brian
ARPA: brian@sally.UTEXAS.EDU
_Work_ _Not Work_
Department of Computer Sciences P.O. Box 5899
Taylor Hall 2.124 Austin, TX 78763-5899
The University of Texas at Austin (512) 346-0835
Austin, TX 78712-1188
(512) 471-9536singer@endor.harvard.edu (Richard Siegel) (11/19/87)
In article <9690@ut-sally.UUCP> brian@ut-sally.UUCP (Brian H. Powell) writes: > >The question is: > > Has Inside Mac Volume V renamed the constant so that "iPfMaxPgs" is > correct, or did THINK goof and accidentally rename it incorrectly? I looked at the MPW Pascal 2.0 interfaces, and the constant is spelled "iPfMaxPgs", with the lower-case "f". It could be a minor slipup on Apple's part, it could be a change in casing scheme, or it could be none of the above. > If it's the former, is it my imagination, or has Apple abandoned their >casing scheme? I think that one instance of a case change doesnt constitute an "abandonment" of the casing scheme. >Brian H. Powell --Rich **The opinions stated herein are my own opinions and do not necessarily represent the policies or opinions of my employer (THINK Technologies, Inc). * Richard M. Siegel | {decvax, ucbvax, sun}!harvard!endor!singer * * Customer Support | singer@endor.harvard.edu * * Symantec, THINK Technologies Division. (No snappy quote) *