[comp.sys.mac] some practical AppleShare questions

hvt@tnosel.UUCP (henq) (02/28/88)

hi,

I manage some 15 macs at my work. We recently got a Mac II and AppleShare
and laserShare and now I am trying to set it all up. But some questions
remain, that are even to diffucult for the dealer.

1.
AppleShare came with system 4.1.
LaserShare has system 3.3 (!) on its disk

I want to use system 4.3 ('release 5.1' sigh...) troughout the network.

How do I go about upgrading the start-up disks ??

Should I : 

A)
make a sys 4.3 disk, use the AppleShae installer to install A.S. and than
install LaserShare with its bundled installer ?

Will this work ? Can one install A.S> and L.S. from disk that has an 
older system version on it than the target disk ?


or should I

B)

upgrade both the A.S. and the L.S. installer disks to sys 4.3 (using the
installer supplied with sys 4.3 ), and than install A.S. & L.S. to the target
disks. (Q: Will the installers on the A.S. and L.S. disks complain about the
system on their disks being upgraded ?).


Any hints on the procedures to follow when one has to install 
AppleShare supplied with System version X and LaserShare supplied with 
system version Y to a target system version Z where 
X <> (OR =) Y <> (OR =) Z 
would be much appreciated.



Another A.S. topic:

Are there already applications that are save to multiple-launch ?

I set the 'Cached' bit of Word 3.01b for example, but that
gave me the nr 26 granate on the second launch. Any help....



-Henq

By the way: I am *very* impressed by AppleShare. Powerful product
yet easy to operate.


Have a nice day

:wq

korn@Apple.COM (Peter "Arrgh" Korn) (03/02/88)

In article <567@tnosel.UUCP> hvt@tnosel.UUCP (henq) writes:
>I manage some 15 macs at my work. We recently got a Mac II and AppleShare
>and laserShare and now I am trying to set it all up. But some questions
>remain, that are even to diffucult for the dealer.
>
>1.
>AppleShare came with system 4.1.
>LaserShare has system 3.3 (!) on its disk
>
>I want to use system 4.3 ('release 5.1' sigh...) troughout the network.
>
>How do I go about upgrading the start-up disks ??

One of the ideas behind the Installer is to install just what needs
installing, and no more unless desired.  You should be able to install
in any order (in general), and see no problems.

The way we do it on our AppleShare Servers and Workstations here at
Apple is to just use the latest System Disk installer, and install
the System & printer drivers over the AppleShare server and workstation disks.

Alternately, if you have a System 5.1 release disk that you want workstation
to be on, simply take out your Workstation Installer disk, and install *just* 
Workstation 1.1.  The same goes for Server.  However, I would recommend 
installing LaserShare after installing Server, this too probably won't make 
any difference.  Again, only install with the AppleShare and LaserShare
scripts when you are  going onto a disk that has a later system.

>Another A.S. topic:
>
>Are there already applications that are save to multiple-launch ?
>
>I set the 'Cached' bit of Word 3.01b for example, but that
>gave me the nr 26 granate on the second launch. Any help....

Strange...  I've had no trouble running Word 3.01 and 3.05 from 
multiple workstations off of 1 server.  Out of the box my copy came
with the 'Cached' bit set (which, for those out there unfamiliar with 
the wonders of ResEdit is *really* the MultiLaunch bit [find this, and
other goodies, in those Tech Notes we send out]).

I believe that Excel is also a Multi-Launch app.

Note:  simply setting the 'cached' bit of an application will NOT make
it multi-launch.  Your application must use the Open/Deny modes detailed
in InsideMac V in order for this to work properly.  Also in vol. V are
calls to do byte-range locking, etc., for multi-user databases.

Peter
-- 
 Peter "Arrgh" Korn    korn@apple.com   !hplabs!amdahl!apple!korn    "Hi mom!"

peter@aucs.UUCP (Peter Steele) (03/02/88)

in article <567@tnosel.UUCP>, hvt@tnosel.UUCP (henq) says:
> 
> By the way: I am *very* impressed by AppleShare. Powerful product
> yet easy to operate.
> 
But will it protect users from each other? I thinking primarily
of a (hostile) student environment where there's always at least
one student who would love to go around wrecking havoc on the
system. In our investigation, we found only one network server
software that had the kind of security we wanted--MacJANET.
(JANET is an acronym for Just Another NETwork.)


-- 
Peter Steele Acadia Univ Wolfville NS Canada B0P1X0 (902)542-2201x121
UUCP: {uunet|watmath|utai|garfield}dalcs!aucs!Peter
BITNET: Peter@Acadia    Internet: Peter%Acadia.BITNET@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU

paul@mit-caf.UUCP (Paul Meyer) (03/04/88)

In article <7535@apple.Apple.Com> korn@apple.UUCP (Peter "Arrgh" Korn) writes:
>Strange...  I've had no trouble running Word 3.01 and 3.05 from 
                                                       ^^^^

	Where did you get version 3.05 of Word!  Is it more compatible with
the rest of the world?  Oh, wait.  Do you mean 1.05?  Bummer.  I was
hoping for a new version.  Oh, well.  I'll have to wait.  Bill Gates said
"every MS Mac application will have a major upgrade this year" when 
talking to the BCS Mac meeting last month.  He also mentioned something
about putting hooks in Microsoft Mac applications to allow some kind of
working together (I don't remember if it was compatible macros, or 
some kind of inter process communication or what).  I guess this probably
isn't it.

Paul Meyer
Microsystems Technology Laboratory
MIT

phd@SPEECH1.CS.CMU.EDU (Paul Dietz) (03/04/88)

In article <809@mit-caf.UUCP> paul@mit-caf.UUCP (Paul Meyer) writes:
>In article <7535@apple.Apple.Com> korn@apple.UUCP (Peter "Arrgh" Korn) writes:
>>Strange...  I've had no trouble running Word 3.01 and 3.05 from 
>                                                       ^^^^
>	Where did you get version 3.05 of Word!

I don't know if anyone cares, but the version of Word I have is 3.02 .
I bought it about three weeks ago. Is this the latest?

Paul H. Dietz                                        ____          ____
Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering        / oo \        <_<\\\
Carnegie Mellon University                        /|  \/  |\        \\ \\
--------------------------------------------     | | (  ) | |       | ||\\
"If God had meant for penguins to fly,             -->--<--        / / |\\\  /
he would have given them wings."            _________^__^_________/ / / \\\\-

lsr@Apple.COM (Larry Rosenstein) (03/09/88)

In article <891@aucs.UUCP> peter@aucs.UUCP (Peter Steele) writes:

>But will it protect users from each other? I thinking primarily
>of a (hostile) student environment where there's always at least
>one student who would love to go around wrecking havoc on the

AppleShare 1.0 & 1.1 did have a problem where a malicious user could steal
someone's folder.  Even though s/he couldn't open the folder s/he could
prevent the legitmate owner from gaining access as well.

AppleShare 2.0, which was recently announced, allows the owner of a folder
to set a flag prohibiting it from being moved, which prevents the folder
from being held hostage.

Are there other ways in which a malicious user can cause problems with
AppleShare? 

-- 
		 Larry Rosenstein,  Object Specialist
 Apple Computer, Inc.  20525 Mariani Ave, MS 32E  Cupertino, CA 95014
	    AppleLink:Rosenstein1    domain:lsr@Apple.COM
		UUCP:{sun,voder,nsc,decwrl}!apple!lsr

sys_ms@bmc1.uu.se (03/20/88)

In article <7603@apple.Apple.Com>, lsr@Apple.COM (Larry Rosenstein) writes:
> In article <891@aucs.UUCP> peter@aucs.UUCP (Peter Steele) writes:
> 
>>But will it protect users from each other? I thinking primarily
>>of a (hostile) student environment where there's always at least
>>one student who would love to go around wrecking havoc on the
> 
> AppleShare 1.0 & 1.1 did have a problem where a malicious user could steal
> someone's folder.  Even though s/he couldn't open the folder s/he could
> prevent the legitmate owner from gaining access as well.
> 
> AppleShare 2.0, which was recently announced, allows the owner of a folder
> to set a flag prohibiting it from being moved, which prevents the folder
> from being held hostage.
> 
> Are there other ways in which a malicious user can cause problems with
> AppleShare? 

There are a very easy way to bypass Appleshares security mechanism, and
gain access to every folder on the system. Without hacking passwords
and without access to the main machine. I am not sure wich version of 
Appleshare I discovered this on. I could check it up.

	Mats Sundvall
	BMC
	University of Uppsala
	Sweden

	mats@bmc1.uu.se