murray@andromeda.rutgers.edu.rutgers.edu (Murray Karstadt) (11/15/88)
Since PS/2 SIMMS run between 80 to 120 nanoseconds and the Mac II needs 120 nanoseconds SIMMS .... could I pop IBM SIMMS in a Mac II. Has anyone done this? Could this create some sort of nasty problem ?? murray
radovanc@vms.macc.wisc.edu (11/15/88)
In article <1014@galaxy>, murray@andromeda.rutgers.edu.rutgers.edu (Murray Karstadt) writes... >Since PS/2 SIMMS run between 80 to 120 nanoseconds and the Mac II needs 120 >nanoseconds SIMMS .... could I pop IBM SIMMS in a Mac II. Has anyone done this? >Could this create some sort of nasty problem ?? > >murray Yup. No problem. Michael Radovancevich radovanc@vms3.macc.wisc.edu
joel@arizona.edu (Joel Snyder) (11/15/88)
In article <1014@galaxy> murray@andromeda (Murray Karstadt) writes: >Since PS/2 SIMMS run between 80 to 120 nanoseconds and the Mac II needs 120 >nanoseconds SIMMS .... could I pop IBM SIMMS in a Mac II. Has anyone done this? >Could this create some sort of nasty problem ?? We do it all the time; it works great! All you have to do is console yourself to paying for nine chips but only using eight. jms