roger@caen.engin.umich.edu (Roger Roberto Espinosa) (06/19/89)
Hi. In the near future, I'm probably going to be getting a paint program. The net seems to think that SuperPaint 2.0 is slow and not as good as it once was, and when I really really think about it, the draw-deal isn't the advantage for me that I once thought it was (now that I'm trying to buy my software in a more practical manner). I was curious if anyone in netland has used/is using Cricket Paint. The feature list seems nice, but I don't remember any of the major mac-zines coming out with a review, and nobody on the net so far as I know has squeaked about this program. Thanks! Roger Espinosa E-MAIL responses to roger@caen.engin.umich.edu, please.
kempf@tci.UUCP (Cory Kempf) (06/21/89)
In article <43edd88a.17b95@frigate.engin.umich.edu> roger@caen.engin.umich.edu (Roger Roberto Espinosa) writes: >I was curious if anyone in netland has used/is using Cricket Paint. >The feature list seems nice, but I don't remember any of the major >mac-zines coming out with a review, and nobody on the net so far as >I know has squeaked about this program. I have used Cricket Paint... I decided that I prefered Superpaint I (hadn't yet had a chance to play with II yet). Cricket Paint looks nice, but it has a clumsy interface, is often a pain to use, and is not nearly as good as I expected after having used Cricket Draw. my $0.02 +C -- Cory Kempf Technology Concepts 40 Tall Pine Dr. uucp: {anywhere}!uunet!tci!kempf, kempf@tci.uu.net Sudbury MA 01776 phone: (508) 443-7311 x341 DISCLAIMER: TCI is not responsible for my opinions, nor I for theirs