[comp.sys.mac] MS Word 4.0 questions

chupa@vax1.acs.udel.EDU (Michael A Chupa) (07/27/89)

Does anyone out there in netland know if the "code" feature
has been excised from Word 4.0?  I can't seem to invoke it in
the way 3.02 did it...selecting a char and clicking in the
page # box.  

briand@tekig4.LEN.TEK.COM (Brian Diehm) (07/29/89)

>Does anyone out there in netland know if the "code" feature
>has been excised from Word 4.0?  I can't seem to invoke it in
>the way 3.02 did it...selecting a char and clicking in the
>page # box.  

Try Command-Option-Q when the selection is between characters. It lets you
type in a code. If you select a character and type Command-Option-Q, it tells
you the code of that character.

There is a Commands... command to do this: Paste Special Character. The entire
feature is undocumented. We found it because one person in the department was
VERY persistent, and discovered Command-Option-Q. With that in hand, we tried
to find the equivalent command. We filed until we tried to assign the Command-
Option-Q sequence to another command, when it asked us if we wanted to de-assign
it from the Paste Special Character command. Voila - we found the magic command
name. Armed with all that, we looked it up in the documentation. COMPLETELY
undocumented.

Thanks, Microsoft. Thpppppt....

BTW, has anyone else noticed that if you install the new Adobe NFNT numbering
scheme for the Symbol font, that equations break in Word. Those stupid dolts
at Microsoft STILL think that font assignment should be saved by number only!
Stupid is one thing, viciously stubbornly stupid should be boycotted. . .


-- 
-Brian Diehm
Tektronix, Inc.                (503) 627-3437         briand@tekig4.LEN.TEK.COM
P.O. Box 500, M/S 39-383
Beaverton, OR   97077                        (SDA - Standard Disclaimers Apply)

sklein@cdp.UUCP (07/29/89)

To find out the ascii value of any character on the screen (in MW Word 4.0):

     1) select (highlight) the character
     2) type Option-Command-Q
-shabtai

davidlu@microsoft.UUCP (David Luebbert) (07/31/89)

>>Does anyone out there in netland know if the "code" feature
>>has been excised from Word 4.0?  I can't seem to invoke it in
>>the way 3.02 did it...selecting a char and clicking in the
>>page # box.  

Brian Diehm (Tektronix, Inc.) replies...
>Try Command-Option-Q when the selection is between characters. It lets you
>type in a code. If you select a character and type Command-Option-Q, it tells
>you the code of that character.

>There is a Commands... command to do this: Paste Special Character. The 
>entire feature is undocumented. We found it because one person in the 
>department was VERY persistent, and discovered Command-Option-Q. With that 
>in hand, we tried to find the equivalent command. We filed until we tried to
>assign the Command-Option-Q sequence to another command, when it asked us if
>we wanted to de-assign it from the Paste Special Character command. Voila - 
>we found the magic command name. Armed with all that, we looked it up in the
>documentation. COMPLETELY undocumented.

>Thanks, Microsoft. Thpppppt....
 Actually, it's very easy to get a list of all of Word 4.0's commands key and
 menu assignments by using the Edit/Commands dialog. Simply press the List 
 button. This creates a new document consisting of a table listing every Word 
 command and its current assignments. If you want to know what a command does
 press the Help... button in the dialog. For Paste Special Character the Help
 button produces the text: "Inserts a special font character indicated by
 decimal code you type". The fact that Word can tell you what a command does
 at user request puts the lie to the claim the Paste Special Character command
 is "COMPLETELY undocumented".


 Dave Luebbert
 Microsoft Corporation

drg@wjh12.harvard.edu (Dean R Gallant) (08/01/89)

In article nnn briand@tekig4.LEN.TEK.COM (Brian Diehm) writes:
>>Does anyone out there in netland know if the "code" feature
>>has been excised from Word 4.0?  
>
>There is a Commands... command to do this: Paste Special Character. The entire
>feature is undocumented. . . .Armed with all that, we looked it up in the 
>documentation. COMPLETELY undocumented.
>
>Thanks, Microsoft. Thpppppt....
>
Appendix D in the 4.0 manual, "The Macintosh Character Set" documents 
this feature succinctly.  It is indexed under "Character set/finding 
character by number" and also under "Searching" and "Macintosh character 
set" and "character formatting/keyboard procedures" and referenced under 
"finding"; in addition there is reference to it on p.58 under "finding 
or replacing with special characters."  These may not be the places that
we'd all have listed the feature, but it's a broad range.  Sometimes,
alas, it helps to thumb through the manual merely to see how the writers
put the thing together.  Often the appendices will contain just the kind of
information you're looking for but don't know how to find in the index.
-- 
     Dean Gallant                             drg@wjh12.harvard.edu  
     Center for the Behavioral Sciences       drg@harvunxw.BITNET 

briand@tekig4.LEN.TEK.COM (Brian Diehm) (08/01/89)

> Actually, it's very easy to get a list of all of Word 4.0's commands key and
> menu assignments by using the Edit/Commands dialog. Simply press the List 
> button. This creates a new document consisting of a table listing every Word 
> command and its current assignments. If you want to know what a command does
> press the Help... button in the dialog. For Paste Special Character the Help
> button produces the text: "Inserts a special font character indicated by
> decimal code you type". The fact that Word can tell you what a command does
> at user request puts the lie to the claim the Paste Special Character command
> is "COMPLETELY undocumented".
>
> Dave Luebbert
> Microsoft Corporation

OK, you win, it's not COMPLETELY undocumented. It's just that in order to find
out about the feature, you have to already know about the feature. When we
started our quest to find the feature (we knew it was in 3.xx), we looked for
all the appropriate topics we could think of in indexes and tables of contents.

WHO WOULD GUESS THIS FEATURE WOULD BE FOUND UNDER PASTE? OR SPECIAL CHARACTER?
We tried Code (suggested from the old feature), ASCII, literal, insert, and
several others, but a group of people spent a half hour on it without getting
it from the manual. Another member of the group found it first by experimen-
tation.

To top it off, when we DID find it, we looked it up under the name Paste
Special Character in the dictionary-style list of topics in the reference
manual. No go. It turns out the discussion is in the "Keyboard" section,
under Paste Special Character. I've gone back and asked people later if
they had seen that, and one person remembers scanning it and rejecting
it as unlikely - mostly because they thought it meant some sort of special
paste operation, as in a variation of the typical paste. I think, but cannot
say for sure, that I did exactly the same thing. In other words, a quick scan
got no farther than "Paste Special..." and the name was rejected as unlikely.

This is a difficult area, I know because I also write user manuals. Believe me,
I sympathize. It is difficult to remember that when the going is hot and heavy,
and you can't find the information you want, you are in the WORST frame of mind
for being able to scan for alternate names, or to figure out THE COMPANY'S name
for whatever it is you are looking for. In this case, several people worked on
it, and at least I had felt that I had gone through the documentation pretty
thoroughly beforehand. The documentation did not anticipate our expectations.

The problem is made worse when the user has a totally different expectation of
how the feature will work than the way it has been implemented. This is the
fault of neither the vendor nor the user, and often the user will understand
the implementation philosophy immediately when it is explained. It's just that
the expectations the user brings to the task (from background, from experience,
or from cultural heritage) may be different. It is the job of the writer to
anticipate all this. (The process is also made difficult when the product is at
variance with established standards, say, Apple's Human Interface Guidelines.
Bruce Tognazzini's article about non-modal modal dialog boxes is particularly
apposite. July 89 Apple Direct)

It is incumbent on the writers to index under EVERY LIKELY title that people
may think of when they search for the feature, not just the name that the
feature has been assigned for that package. That's a tall order, and Microsoft
isn't alone in doing a less-than-perfect job. However, the lack of user-
orientation as opposed to "official" orientation seems pretty strong in Word
documentation.

If Microsoft differs with this opinion, they should listen to their customers
instead of trying to shout them down. I am certainly not alone in my critical
assessment, if my incoming mailbox is to be believed.

-- 
-Brian Diehm
Tektronix, Inc.                (503) 627-3437         briand@tekig4.LEN.TEK.COM
P.O. Box 500, M/S 39-383
Beaverton, OR   97077                        (SDA - Standard Disclaimers Apply)

weinhous@dinorah.wustl.edu (Martin S. Weinhous) (08/01/89)

In article <379@wjh12.harvard.edu>, drg@wjh12.harvard.edu (Dean R Gallant) writes:
> In article nnn briand@tekig4.LEN.TEK.COM (Brian Diehm) writes:
> >... command to do this: Paste Special Character. The entire
> >feature is undocumented. . . .Armed with all that, we looked it up in the 
> >documentation. COMPLETELY undocumented.
> >
> Appendix D in the 4.0 manual, "The Macintosh Character Set" documents 
> this feature succinctly.

Perhaps Microsoft should recognize from the above and other similar
comments that the documentation index needs to be expanded and needs
better cross-referencing.  I also have been too often been frustrated
by the Word 4 reference manual index.

jhenry@randvax.UUCP (Jim Henry) (08/03/89)

Paste Special Character is documented on p. 158 of the User's Guide.  It is
indexed under the heading "Special Character".