david@jc3b21.UUCP (David Quarles) (10/17/89)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= WE ARE LOOKING FOR AN EXCELLENT BOOK IN ADDITION TO THE MANUAL SUPPLIED. Some of the third party publishers have better ways of illustrating a concept or idea, for example Kinata and McComb have a good one on Word 3.02 and the Cobb Group have one also. Has anyone used one on 4.0 that they would recommend ???? Thanks. =-=-= Email: david@jc3b21.UUCP -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dave =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= EOT
chuq@Apple.COM (Chuq Von Rospach) (10/18/89)
>Some of the third party publishers have better ways of illustrating a >concept or idea, for example Kinata and McComb have a good one on Word >3.02 and the Cobb Group have one also. >Has anyone used one on 4.0 that they would recommend ???? The Cobb Group's "Word 4 Companion" is the one I use constantly. Good index, good, complete material, well written. Few oversights and some good hints. If you're looking for *a* source, it's it. also very good for rampaging cockroaches or doberman pinschers, due to the weight -- it's a big, heavy thing. -- Chuq Von Rospach <+> Editor,OtherRealms <+> Member SFWA/ASFA chuq@apple.com <+> CI$: 73317,635 <+> [This is myself speaking] Anyone who thinks that the argument over {sci,rec}.fishies is about group names doesn't understand the system.
kehr@felix.UUCP (Shirley Kehr) (10/19/89)
In article <777@jc3b21.UUCP> david@jc3b21.UUCP (David Quarles) writes:
<=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
<WE ARE LOOKING FOR AN EXCELLENT BOOK IN ADDITION TO THE MANUAL SUPPLIED.
<
<Some of the third party publishers have better ways of illustrating a
<concept or idea, for example Kinata and McComb have a good one on Word
<3.02 and the Cobb Group have one also.
<
<Has anyone used one on 4.0 that they would recommend ????
I recommend the two you have cited as the best.
Shirley