pane@cat.cmu.edu (John Pane) (11/28/89)
Has anybody evaluated White Knight at high baud rates (>9600)? I am using Red Ryder 10.3 at 19.2 Kbaud, and screen display is a major bottleneck. Does White Knight do any better? -- John Pane pane@cs.cmu.edu School of Computer Science Carnegie Mellon University (412) 268-5884
ngg@bridge2.ESD.3Com.COM (Norman Goodger) (11/29/89)
In article <7116@pt.cs.cmu.edu> pane@cat.cmu.edu (John Pane) writes: > >Has anybody evaluated White Knight at high baud rates (>9600)? I am using >Red Ryder 10.3 at 19.2 Kbaud, and screen display is a major bottleneck. >Does White Knight do any better? The throughput of White knight is significantly faster than 10.3. It keeps up at 9600 without problems, at 19.2 there maybe some lag, course this depends somewhat on how fast your Mac is (Plus,Se,II,CX,CI) and if you are using color on color machines? -- Norm Goodger SysOp - MacInfo BBS @415-795-8862 3Com Corp. Co-SysOp FreeSoft RT - GEnie. Enterprise Systems Division (I disclaim anything and everything) UUCP: {3comvax,auspex,sun}!bridge2!ngg Internet: ngg@bridge2.ESD.3Com.COM
gall@yunexus.UUCP (Norm Gall) (11/29/89)
pane@cat.cmu.edu (John Pane) writes: | Has anybody evaluated White Knight at high baud rates (>9600)? I am using | Red Ryder 10.3 at 19.2 Kbaud, and screen display is a major bottleneck. | Does White Knight do any better? Wk 11.01, 19200bps, Mac plus, oodles of INTS, cdevs, ATM... no problems..... A little jerky with smooth scroll off though... nrg -- York University | "Philosophers who make the general claim that a Department of Philosophy | rule simply 'reduces to' its formulations Toronto, Ontario, Canada | are using Occam's razor to cut the throat _________________________| of common sense.' - R. Harris