jprice@uclapp.physics.ucla.edu (John Price) (03/08/90)
Here's the evaluation of Redux I promised. Don't worry, it'll be short. Good points: incredibly easy to use; good manual Bad points: slow (27Meg in 1:08); no data compression Before I damn them for being slow, I should say that I think my disk was pretty fragmented before I started - that would slow down the disk i/o, which could in part explain the lack of speed. However, it seems that since they're not writing files in Finder-readable format anyway, they should go ahead and compress the data - would this be faster due to not needing so many disks, or would the compression itself end up taking more time (Microseeds, are you out there)? Also, would compression be compatible with the imaging method of backup that they now use? This is an imaging program - my backup set (37 disks) contains the entire disk. When I delete a file from my hard disk, and do a backup, that file gets deleted from the backup save set. This should cut down on the number of disks used by a large number. It appears to be fully customizable. I say "appears", because I didn't try it, and probably won't. I am not a power user, I just want to make my backups as painless as possible. Luckily, incrementals should go quickly, since I won't be changing all that many files all that often. All in all, I like it. As I say, the first time you use it, it's slow, but this program seems designed to make incremental backups rather than full ones. You only do *one* full backup. Ever. I like that... Disclaimer - I have no connections with Microseeds. They did not pay me for this. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- John Price | Internet: jprice@uclapp.physics.ucla.edu 5-145 Knudsen Hall | BITNET: price@uclaph UCLA Dept. of Physics | DECnet: uclapp::jprice Los Angeles, CA 90024-1547 | YellNet: 213-825-2259 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Where there is no solution, there is no problem.