jdn@homxc.UUCP (J.NAGY) (11/12/87)
Has anyone succesfully uudecoded the recent GULAM postings?
I found that all my byte counts were initially 2 bytes larger
than those posted, pesumably due to two extra blank lines at the
end of each file. I deleted these extraneous blank lines, and all
the byte counts matched. But when I try to to uudecode them, I
get the message "Short file", and indeed, my gulam.arc is only
22284 bytes. [My files are correctly named gulam.uaa, etc.]
Any suggestions?
Jonathan Nagy
{ihnp4|allegra|harvard}!homxc!jdn
(201) 615-4349dhawk@well.UUCP (David Hawkins) (11/13/87)
In the referenced article, jdn@homxc.UUCP (J.NAGY) wrote: > >Has anyone succesfully uudecoded the recent GULAM postings? Yup. I saved all three parts to one file. Edited it with vi and removed the header of the first part. Searched for the line that started with include and deleted it down to the table line of the second part and make it seamless, i.e. all lines starting with X and did the same connecting the second part to the third part. so when I finished the whole file looked the same (after the first table header) with each line starting with the same character. Ran uudecode on it. Ditto for the doc file. arc said they were ok, so I downloaded them to the ST and de-arced them there. They were fine and I've enjoyed using the new Gulam. Hope that helps. -- David Hawkins {ptsfa,hplabs,ucbvax}!well!dhawk It is a luxury to be understood. - Ralph Waldo Emerson -
euloth@dalcsug.UUCP (George Seto) (11/14/87)
I have noticed that it appears some people have received the Gulam files. Unfortunately here, we seem to have only received the last three parts of the Gulam docs. Anyway someone could resend the rest of those? If so thanks. George Seto - Using a friend's account.