[comp.sys.atari.st] An Idea That I had

juancho@dgp.toronto.edu (John Buchanan) (03/21/88)

	It seems that We have spent a lot of time flaming atari lately.
I am interested in compiling a list of responses to the following two
questions about the st.  

1)  What is the smartest thing that atari has ever done?

2)  (This is the one that you'll love) What is the stupidest thing
    that atari has ever done.

Please answer the first question before you answer the second question.
I will try to compile some kind of list .

=====================================================================
| Typical conversation on comp.[atari|amiga|mac].*		    |
=====================================================================
My watch is better than yours.  It has multitasking, windows and
plays Old macdonald has a farm.  I will not listen to reason, of
course your watch is not as good as mine, in fact you are
silly for having bought it.  Sell it and buy my kind.
   o /
====X================================================================
   o \
John W. Buchanan                  Dynamic Graphics Project
               			  Computer Systems Research Institute
(416) 978-6619			  University of Toronto
juancho@dgp.toronto.edu
juancho@toronto.CSNET
{allegra,cornell,decvax,ihnp4,linus,utzoo}!utdgp!juancho

-- 

John W. Buchanan                  Dynamic Graphics Project
               			  Computer Systems Research Institute
				  University of Toronto
(416) 978-6619			  Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A4

rjung@sal6.usc.edu (Robert Jung) (03/22/88)

  I didn't know whether to reply by e-mail or the net, and since I hate
having my mail bounced (Editing the mailer line? Whuzzat?), I might as well
send it here...


In article <8803210203.AA26500@explorer.dgp.toronto.edu> juancho@dgp.toronto.edu (John Buchanan) writes:
>	It seems that We have spent a lot of time flaming atari lately.
>I am interested in compiling a list of responses to the following two
>questions about the st.  
>
>1)  What is the smartest thing that atari has ever done?

  Releasing the ST. A versatile machine, with a LOT of potential.


>2)  (This is the one that you'll love) What is the stupidest thing
>    that atari has ever done.

  Their continuing record of "announce something today, release it nine
months from now" is my pet peeve. Blows credibility, makes us all look a tad
silly, and gives lots of brilliant ideas to Apple/IBM/everyone else. If
you're going to do something, do it *NOW*.



>Please answer the first question before you answer the second question.
>I will try to compile some kind of list .

  Maybe you can add it to Roy Good's 200+ comments/2 lines-a-comment list  B-)


						--R.J.
						B-)

P.S. I'd just also like to throw in the following line:

  Let's give Atari *SOME* credit. Considering that Atari Corp. has been only
around for TWO years, they've done quite a bit. A chain of electronics
store, a (semi?)solid computer line, some fairly nice profit levels, and
more stability than two years ago, is a LOT to accomplish. Admittedly, not
everything has been perfect, but hopefully things will change (the attentiveness
of people like Roy Good and Alan Pratt to listen to our net.criticisms
is nice...  B-)
______________________________________________________________________________
Bitnet: rjung@castor.usc.edu              "Who needs an Amiga?"    = == =    
                                                                   = == =    
                  Power WithOUT the Price                          = == =    
                                                               ===== == =====
   Just because it's 8-bits doesn't make it obsolete.          ====  ==  ==== 

wes@obie.UUCP (Barnacle Wes) (03/26/88)

In article <8803210203.AA26500@explorer.dgp.toronto.edu>, juancho@dgp.toronto.edu (John Buchanan) writes:
< =====================================================================
< | Typical conversation on comp.[atari|amiga|mac].*		    |
< =====================================================================
< My watch is better than yours.  It has multitasking, windows and
< plays Old macdonald has a farm.  I will not listen to reason, of
< course your watch is not as good as mine, in fact you are
< silly for having bought it.  Sell it and buy my kind.
<    o /
< ====X================================================================
<    o \
< John W. Buchanan                  Dynamic Graphics Project

But John, my watch *DOES* have windows, and it does multi-tasking too!
(It has 5 alarms, a countdown timer, a stopwatch, day/date/year, etc).
Now, if I could only get it to sing "Old MacDonald," I'd be in watch
heaven.   :-O

	Wes Peters
-- 
    /\              -  "Against Stupidity,  -    {backbones}!
   /\/\  .    /\    -  The Gods Themselves  -  utah-cs!utah-gr!
  /    \/ \/\/  \   -   Contend in Vain."   -  uplherc!sp7040!
 / U i n T e c h \  -       Schiller        -     obie!wes

achowe@watmsg.waterloo.edu (CrackerJack) (03/29/88)

In article <91@obie.UUCP> wes@obie.UUCP (Barnacle Wes) writes:
>In article <8803210203.AA26500@explorer.dgp.toronto.edu>, juancho@dgp.toronto.edu (John Buchanan) writes:
>< =====================================================================
>< | Typical conversation on comp.[atari|amiga|mac].*		    |
>< =====================================================================
>< My watch is better than yours.  It has multitasking, windows and
>< plays Old macdonald has a farm.  I will not listen to reason, of
>< course your watch is not as good as mine, in fact you are
>< silly for having bought it.  Sell it and buy my kind.
><    o /
>< ====X================================================================
><    o \
>< John W. Buchanan                  Dynamic Graphics Project
>
>But John, my watch *DOES* have windows, and it does multi-tasking too!
>(It has 5 alarms, a countdown timer, a stopwatch, day/date/year, etc).
>Now, if I could only get it to sing "Old MacDonald," I'd be in watch
>heaven.   :-O
>
>	Wes Peters

Well while we're at it...

My watch is *NOT* digital so will survive an EMF blast and it does
*NOT* have windows but a csh (multi-tasking is an optional extra).
It also supports...

o regular hour & minute hand
o 24 hr hand
o 12 hr stop-watch
o day / date (days are even written in French)
o tachometer gauge
o can endure 200m (!!!) water depth and 6 g's
o self-winding (auto-boot feature)
o scratch proof glass
o pretty glow-in-the-dark arms and dots
o AND the tick sound has a distinctive yodel to it

Anyway, digital watches are for USERs. Real programmers... :)

"Why are people born, why do people die, why do they spend so much
of the intervining time wearing digital watches?"
  - Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy