csrobe@ICASE.ARPA (Charles S. Roberson) (04/15/88)
I saw this on a unix mailing list and was curious if anyone could confirm it. Does the ST actually conform to this extended character set? ---begin forwarded message--- From: Peter da Silva <peter%sugar.UUCP@uunet.UU.NET> Newsgroups: comp.std.unix Subject: Re: 8-Bit ASCII Standard on UNIX-POSIX Reply-To: sugar!peter@uunet.UU.NET (Peter da Silva) Organization: Sugar Land UNIX - Houston, TX Date: 14 Apr 88 00:54:17 GMT Apparently-To: std-unix-list From: peter@sugar.UUCP (Peter da Silva) > From: guy@Sun.COM (Guy Harris) > The ISO 8859/1 character set, also known as "ISO Latin > Alphabet #1", has been adopted or will be adopted by a number of vendors for > Western European use; AT&T ... Sun ... Apollo ... DEC ... Add the Commodore Amiga and (I think) the Atari ST to the list... -- -- Peter da Silva `-_-' ...!hoptoad!academ!uhnix1!sugar!peter -- "Have you hugged your U wolf today?" ...!bellcore!tness1!sugar!peter -- Disclaimer: These aren't mere opinions, these are *values*. Volume-Number: Volume 13, Number 51 ---end forwarded message--- Thanks, -c +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |Chip Roberson ARPANET: csrobe@icase.arpa | |1105 London Company Way BITNET: $csrobe@wmmvs.bitnet | |Williamsburg, VA 23185 UUCP: ...!uunet!pyrdc!gmu90x!wmcs!csrobe| +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ "One world is enough, for all of us..." - The Police.
poole@forty2.UUCP (Simon Poole) (04/17/88)
NO! -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- UUCP: ...mcvax!cernvax!forty2!poole Simon Poole BITNET: K538915@CZHRZU1A ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
egisin@watmath.waterloo.edu (Eric Gisin) (04/18/88)
In article <8804151159.AA12952@work1.icase>, csrobe@ICASE.ARPA (Charles S. Roberson) writes: > I saw this on a unix mailing list and was curious if anyone could confirm > it. Does the ST actually conform to this extended character set? > [ISO Latin-1]. No. It does have many of Latin-1's characters, but in different positions. I have a translation table that maps Latin-1 to ST codes, if anyone is interested.