bracer@TSfR.UUCP (Hava S. Bracer) (08/22/88)
A) No comment.
B) But, we can't fix that. We hav'ta stay compatible with everything back
to the stone age.
C) What <promised product>? We never OFFICIALLY announced that product, and
if we did we never OFFICIALLY said the price would be <promised price>.
[h.s.bracer @ This Space for Rent]usenet@TSfR.UUCP (usenet) (08/24/88)
In article <497@TSfR.UUCP> bracer@TSfR.UUCP (Hava S. Bracer) writes: > [an interesting list of atari failings] < But at least they are beginning to show some signs of changing. Even though 99% of the recent articles from atari have been vigorously defending the status quo, at least they are posting on (and presumably reading?) Usenet. That's good for the "unofficial" developer who can't afford the premiums to get onto services like Bix or GEnie. Add to that some of their recent hirings (kbad, for example) and the atari node on the STadel network and it begins to look like a little bit of light is beginning to dawn in someone's* head in Atariland. It's a lot easier to put up with gemdog when I know that Atari may actually be listening to complaints from -any- user of the machine. [ Orcish commentary about Pexec() and xargs deleted ] -david parsons | Not opinions; I -orc@pell.citadel (US 504 588 1258 3-2400 baud) | speak -TRUTH-