gl8f@bessel.acc.Virginia.EDU (Greg Lindahl) (05/08/89)
In article <3944@tekcrl.LABS.TEK.COM> danw@tekchips.LABS.TEK.COM (Daniel E. Wilson) writes: >In article <537@TSfR.UUCP>, usenet@TSfR.UUCP (usenet) writes: >> In article <103@sdcc10.ucsd.EDU> cs163afu@sdcc10.ucsd.edu.UUCP (Some call me...Tim) writes: [ lots of conflicting information, none of it having anything to do with anything but IBM PC hardware, deleted. ] Can this dicussion be continued in mail or in comp.sys.ibm.pc, where it belongs? This newsgroup is for discussing the Atari ST. If you want to talk about what the Norton SI rating of PC Ditto II is, that's appropriate. But if you want to make a bunch of misinformed or informed postings about the history of the processor in the original IBM PC AT, that isn't. Thanks! ------ Greg Lindahl | gl8f@virginia.{edu,bitnet} | Veraj Programistoj ne uzas PASCAL-on