harryk@bucsb.UUCP (Harry Karayiannis) (02/06/90)
(Since my mail to Stephen Jacobs keeps bouncing, i reply through the net)
Steph, thanks a lot for your information...but what do you mean it's not
stable? Do you refer to the comparison between ver 3.10 and ver 3.9 1/4,or
you compare it with another implementation of EMACS for micros?
I just didn't understand whether you consider ver 3.9 1/4 to be stable or not
IMHO ver 3.9 1/4 is good enough(i admit it's slow while reading or writing to
the drive, but,perhaps it's due to the fact that it uses the UNIX-like function
fwrite() and fread(), instead of the BIOS ones: Fwrite() and Fread()...I don't
know for sure, though)
Anyway, it has some other neat features (like C-mode for .c and .h files, sup
ports MWC's and Personal PAscal's enviroments + a lot more) and thus I can live
with its slow drive-access. Does ver 3.10 support all of the features of ver
3.9 1/4?
I would like to thank you again, and if you have the time please reply this
message too!
Take care!
HARRY KARAYIANNIS
3rd Year Computer Science
BOSTON UNIVERSITY
---------------------------------------------- SORIE FOR ANIE MISPELSS --------
I am just another Greek!