[comp.sys.atari.st] Usenet Ethics

jfbruno@rodan.acs.syr.edu (John Bruno) (06/13/90)

In article <1990Jun12.132224.14479@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> cmm1@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Christopher M Mauritz) writes:
 >In article <1990Jun11.211750.12359@cbnewsd.att.com> tainter@cbnewsd.att.com (johnathan.tainter) writes:
 >>In article <Y|}$A=*@rpi.edu> kibo@pawl15.pawl.rpi.edu (James 'Kibo' Parry) writes:
 >>>[]
 >>>	About half the articles in comp.sys.atari.st lately have included
 >>>'TT' or '030' in their subject lines.
 >
 >Though I suspect only about half of the articles actually talked about
 >the TT.

This is the real issue, I don't think it's wrong to post comparisons of the
Atari with some other machine, but it's a real drag to have to sit there and
wait for a whole screen of "A3000 this and A3000 that" to print out because
you hit the space bar expecting to see something about "Re: Atari TT Released".
Especially if you have a 1200 baud modem.  It would be nice if people were
considerate enough to let people know what their post is about without having
to wait for a screen full of text.

Of course, now that I've pointed this out, I'm sure someone else will say
"everybody just post what John Bruno wants to read" (hehe)

 >I don't think this is the case at all.  A few ST users and a few Amiga users
 >posted specs on the A3000 as a comparison of what was expected
 >performance-wise from the TT.  

Actually, what is posted under the "TT Released" header is mostly people
correcting previous posts that dealt exclusively with A3000 details.

 >Then a few die-hard Atari love-it-orleave-it
 >babies turned on the flame throwers.  

Uh-huh.

 >>I don't think a system which is not yet available, is only sort of defined,
 >>and which will probably never see sales in the U.S. (all do respect to
 >>the international contingent but the U.S. constitutes the major volume of
 >>toy computer sales) is really going to sustain a whole newgroup for very long
 >>until by some off chance it really does get sold.
 >
 >No argument there.  Even IF the machine is sold, I don't think there
 >will be enough sold to sustain a newsgroup IMHO.

I agree also. Maybe we should have comp.sys.atari.tt-amiga-comparisons, but
then there wouldn't be any traffic left for comp.sys.atari.st

 [Discussion of oceanic mammals deleted]

 >>
 >>>james "kibo" parry, 138 birch lane, scotia, ny 12302 <-- close to schenectady.
 >>
 >>--johnathan.a.tainter--
 >>   att!ihlpb!tainter
 >
 >Chris
 >
 >------------------------------+---------------------------
 >Chris Mauritz                 |Donde hay una cerveza
 >cmm1@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu   |hay un plan.
 >(c)All rights reserved.       |
 >Send flames to /dev/null      |El Guerrero Aereo es el rey!
 >------------------------------+---------------------------

---jb