[comp.sys.atari.st] 68030 execptions

neil@cs.hw.ac.uk (Neil Forsyth) (06/27/90)

In article <22615@boulder.Colorado.EDU> walkerb@tramp.Colorado.EDU
(Brian Walker) writes:
]The differences between the 68000 and its sucessors can be summed up in the
]inclusion of the format/vector offset word.
]              68000                                 68010++
]_________________________________      __________________________________
]|________STATUS_REGISTER________|      |________STATUS_REGISTER_________|
]|_____PROGRAM_COUNTER_HIGH______|      |_____PROGRAM_COUNTER_HIGH_______|
]|_____PROGRAM_COUNTER_LOW_______|      |_____PROGRAM_COUNTER_LOW________|
]	variables follow               |FORMAT_|_____VECTOR_OFFSET______|
]                                       |_______other information________|
]                                       |_____depending on exception_____|
]                                                variables follow

Thanks Brian! That's exactly what I wanted to know. So basically it's just
variable access that is affected seriously. Now I can avoid any TT pitfalls.

]Brian Walker                          There come a time in the history
]walkerb@tramp.colorado.edu            of every project when it becomes
]..!ncar!boulder!tramp!walkerb        necessary to shoot the engineers
]University of Colorado, Boulder       and begin production.

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
! DISCLAIMER:Unless otherwise stated, the above comments are entirely my own !
!                                                                            !
! Neil Forsyth                      JANET:  neil@uk.ac.hw.cs                 !
! Dept. of Computer Science         ARPA:   neil@cs.hw.ac.uk                 !
! Heriot-Watt University            UUCP:   ..!ukc!cs.hw.ac.uk!neil          !
! Edinburgh, Scotland, UK           "spam spaM spAM sPAM SPAM, lovely SPAM"  !
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+