[comp.sys.atari.st] International Character sets

ralph@laas.fr (Ralph P. Sobek) (06/17/91)

In article <15480016@hpdmd48.boi.hp.com> ritchie@hpdmd48.boi.hp.com (David Ritchie) writes:

| >In article <3188@odin.cs.hw.ac.uk>, neil@cs.hw.ac.uk (Neil Forsyth) writes:

| >Darnded right!  Atari really screwed up.  Why didn't they use the IBM character
| 
|    The real question is why IBM doesn't have Bob in its character set.

Well, actually why doesn't *everyone* use ISO-Latin-1 ?
--
Ralph P. Sobek			  Disclaimer: The above ruminations are my own.
ralph@laas.fr				   Addresses are ordered by importance.
ralph@laas.uucp, or ...!uunet!laas!ralph		
If all else fails, try:				      sobek@eclair.Berkeley.EDU
===============================================================================
Proud owner of a Mega 4 ST.  Wishing it was a Mega STe!  :-|

warwick@cs.uq.oz.au (Warwick Allison) (06/19/91)

>| >Darnded right!  Atari really screwed up.  Why didn't they use the IBM character
>| 
>|    The real question is why IBM doesn't have Bob in its character set.

>Well, actually why doesn't *everyone* use ISO-Latin-1 ?

I heard Atari was trying to capture the Arab market (so that's what all those
squiggles are!)

Warwick.
--
  _-_|\       warwick@cs.uq.oz.au
 /     *  <-- Computer Science Department,
 \_.-._/      University of Queensland,
      v       Brisbane, AUSTRALIA.

jimomura@lsuc.on.ca (Jim Omura) (06/19/91)

In article <2007@uqcspe.cs.uq.oz.au> warwick@cs.uq.oz.au writes:
>
>>| >Darnded right!  Atari really screwed up.  Why didn't they use the IBM character
>>| 
>>|    The real question is why IBM doesn't have Bob in its character set.
>
>>Well, actually why doesn't *everyone* use ISO-Latin-1 ?
>
>I heard Atari was trying to capture the Arab market (so that's what all those
>squiggles are!)

     Well, actually, the North American version has Hebrew letters.
We don't have Arabic.


-- 
Jim Omura, 2A King George's Drive, Toronto, (416) 652-3880
lsuc!jimomura
Byte Information eXchange: jimomura

adamd@rhi.hi.is (Adam David) (06/20/91)

In <RALPH.91Jun17145750@orion.laas.fr> ralph@laas.fr (Ralph P. Sobek) writes:

>Well, actually why doesn't *everyone* use ISO-Latin-1 ?

Otherwise known as 8859-1. It is the character set used on this here Uni*
system. Also all ST, Amiga and Archimedes sold in Iceland use Latin-1.
Pity about IBM and Apple, but we all know they aren't *real* (please no flames).
I wonder which other countries have ISO 8859-1 installed in their Atari systems.

Email answers please, I will summarise.

--
Adam David.
(adamd@rhi.hi.is)

silvert@cs.dal.ca (Bill Silvert) (06/21/91)

In article <1991Jun19.145148.3668@lsuc.on.ca> jimomura@lsuc.on.ca (Jim Omura) writes:
>In article <2007@uqcspe.cs.uq.oz.au> warwick@cs.uq.oz.au writes:
>     Well, actually, the North American version has Hebrew letters.
>We don't have Arabic.

That has always puzzled me.  There aren't enough letters there to write
either Hebrew or Yiddish, and only a few letters (like alef) are used in
other languages.  What does a partial Hebrew alphabet do for you?
-- 
William Silvert, Habitat Ecology Division, Bedford Inst. of Oceanography
P. O. Box 1006, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, CANADA B2Y 4A2.  Tel. (902)426-1577
UUCP=..!{uunet|watmath}!dalcs!biome!silvert
BITNET=silvert%biome%dalcs@dalac	InterNet=silvert%biome@cs.dal.ca