mp1u+@andrew.cmu.edu.UUCP (09/24/87)
has anyone caught this bug [reported by Info]? Mounted disks: Unit Size Used Free Full Errs Status Name DF0: 880K 518 1240 29% 0 Read/Write hack stuff RAM: 0K -1 0 100% 0 Read/Write Volumes available: hack stuff [Mounted] RAM Disk [Mounted] Workbench 1.2 How is it possible for RAM: to have -1 blocks used? Mike Portuesi / Carnegie-Mellon University ARPA/UUCP: mp1u+@andrew.cmu.edu BITNET: rainwalker@drycas (a uVax-1 run by CMU Computer Club...tons o' fun) "that you were ever tempted by the lie...that there's an answer in the sky" --Echo and the Bunnymen, "Never Stop"
bryce@hoser.berkeley.edu.UUCP (09/24/87)
In article <4VK6tLy00WAE8Vc07D@> mp1u+@andrew.cmu.edu (Michael Portuesi) writes: )has anyone caught this bug [reported by Info]? )... )RAM: 0K -1 0 100% 0 Read/Write )... >How is it possible for RAM: to have -1 blocks used? You can get this by running out of memory on the *first* copy to RAM:. Hook up too little memory to your Amiga and copy bigfile to ram:. This was reported to Commodore about October of 1986, ie. just too late for them to have considered fixing it for V1.2. |\ /| . Ack! (NAK, ENQ, SYN) {o O} . (") bryce@hoser.berkeley.EDU -or- ucbvax!hoser!bryce U How can you go back if you have not yet gone forth?