jack@citcom.UUCP (Jack Waugh) (11/15/87)
> Virtual memory and real-time don't get along.
Why not side-by-side? Keep your real-time system, and
allocate some memory to a virtual memory system that
would run at lower priority. It shouldn't be too hard
to put a gateway between the two so a program in the
protected environment could send text, graphics procedure
calls, etc. to a server in the real-time world.shs@ji.Berkeley.EDU (Steve Schoettler) (11/17/87)
In article <113@citcom.UUCP> jack@citcom.UUCP (Jack Waugh) writes: >> Virtual memory and real-time don't get along. > >Why not side-by-side? Keep your real-time system, and >allocate some memory to a virtual memory system that >would run at lower priority. Yeeeech! VM and real time work together just fine. If you're waiting for an important event, simply tell the system not to page you out. How do you think the operating system keeps from paging out the paging code? :-) Steve