[net.general] fa.* from Berkeley

ARPAVAX:CAD:ESVAX:Cory:erik (05/27/82)

	As I understand it, Berkeley did not stop forwarding the fa.* groups.
The moderators took the post-*@Berkeley out of the lists. This was in response
to Berkeley shutting off UUCP => ARPA mail. This route was shut off due to
complaints from some arpanauts who got mail from uucp via Berkeley, which did
not comform to the ARPAnet mail standard RFC733. The digest moderators took
the position that there was a large audience out in uucpland that they could
talk to, but not listen to, and that this was somehow unacceptable.
	This is the information as I know it. If there is someone at CSRG who
is knows more, please speak up. (I mean Berkeley's CSRG, apologies to Toronto)
	
		Erik E. Fair
		Cory.erik@Berkeley	(ARPA)
		ucbvax!ucbcory!erik	(UUCP)

mp (05/31/82)

Erik Fair's explanation is almost correct.  Berkeley stopped
transmitting netnews over the Arpanet, and somehow people interpreted
this as meaning "Berkeley is not forwarding any mail to the Arpanet." A
separate issue was that some WorkS subscribers who were high Arpa
muckymucks were complaining about the lack of "To" fields in messages.
Contrary to what Erik said, the messages DID conform to the RFC733
standard, it's just that people prefer "To" fields (if you're on about
20 lists like I am, you begin to get irritated when a message contains
no "To" field).  That standard, by the way, is finally being revised by
Dave Crocker at UDel.

The bottom line, I'm told, is that there's "no problem" if the digest
is moderated and if the moderator is situated on a uucpnet/Arpanet
boundary so that no submission to the moderator has to traverse part of
a taboo net.  Some digests are already being distributed this way, some
are not.  The phrase "no problem" isn't really accurate, because Arpa
still hasn't sanctioned most of these mailing lists in the first place,
and they certainly haven't sanctioned any uucp/Arpa gateways.  Berkeley
is perfectly free to turn off the gateway anytime they choose (or are
told to).

I asked the Arpanet digest moderators to clarify what was going on, and
apparently every major list is being fed into USENET again, through
various gateways.  Telecom, human-nets, and sf-lovers were suspended
because Berkeley's C70 (the Arpanet machine) got a filled disk or
something last week and the mailer began sending errors back to the
digest moderators; I'm told that the service has since been restored.
Additional information may be gotten by talking to unc!brl-bmd!jsol.

	Mark Plotnick, MIT