ARPAVAX:bradr (05/17/82)
I am doing a project on the sociolinguistic aspects of communication over computer links, both interactive (like UNIX "write") and batch (like this newsitem). I am looking for: * Accounts of interesting interactions (as opposed to interesting content) over computer links. * Descriptions of conventions used during interactive communication at various installations. (e.g. at Berkeley, we use "-o-" as a turn-taking convention to mean "I am through talking, now it's your turn"). * What, to you, constitutes inappropriate or unsophisticated use of the medium (e.g. Are there circumstances under which you consider it rude for someone to initiate an interactive discussion? When reading a message, does its structure (as opposed to content) give you any clues as to how "computer-wise" the writer is?) * Jargon you use particular to the medium (e.g. "cul" for "see you later" when terminating a conversation). * Any pointers to literature on this topic you may know about. Of course, I have combed a lot of news articles for this type of stuff, but collecting interactive conversation is more difficult, because of the obvious ethical problems of monitoring other people's interactions (It would be wiretapping really, just easier to program). So I am depending on voluntary contributions. If you have any information you would like to share, please send it to me via reply mail. Thanks. Brad Rubenstein, ucbarpa!bradr, bradr@berkeley
ARPAVAX:bradr (06/12/82)
My thanks to all who contributed in response to my USENET query on your experiences in using computer mediated communication for my sociolinguistics term project. The paper evolved into a general exposition on the various forms such communication can take, with a small amount of analysis on adaptive mechanisms people use to deal with these forms. The exposition is at a fairly elementary level to you people out in USENET land, though a portion on the use of TDD's by the Deaf community you might find interesting. A number of you asked for copies of the completed paper. Because the paper is long (approx 20 pages) and the topic slightly different than what you expected, I am not just mailing out to clutter up your tty screens. If you would still like a copy, just send me mail. Brad Rubenstein ...ucbvax!r:bradr (uucp) r.bradr@berkeley (arpanet)