[comp.sys.amiga] Oops, I meant '286

dg2l+@andrew.cmu.edu (Douglas Phillip Ghormley) (03/08/88)

Sorry, not the '386 Bridge Board, the '286 (I hope too hard sometimes).

I'm in the process of buying a 2000 and I'd like to have the IBM 
compatibility, but if the AT Bridge board is going to be out sometime soon 
(i.e. this summer), then I'll hold off for it.  Any word, either official or 
otherwise?

Thanks,
-Doug
 (dg2l+@andrew.cmu.edu)

[This space left unintentionally blank.]

tope@enea.se (Tommy Petersson) (03/09/88)

In article <kWB0kJy00XoAp4Y07d@andrew.cmu.edu> dg2l+@andrew.cmu.edu (Douglas Phillip Ghormley) writes:
>
>Sorry, not the '386 Bridge Board, the '286 (I hope too hard sometimes).
>
>I'm in the process of buying a 2000 and I'd like to have the IBM 
>compatibility, but if the AT Bridge board is going to be out sometime soon 
>(i.e. this summer), then I'll hold off for it.  Any word, either official or 
>otherwise?


Since the Bridgeboard currently is on sale, and also based on words
from Commodore-related people, I would say beginning of April.

shimoda@rmi.UUCP (Markus Schmidt) (03/09/88)

Hi!

By the way: Can anyone tell me, if the new '386 board from
intel will work with my Amiga 2000A and my bridgeboard (one
of th  first)?

Thanx, 
Markus
(shimoda@rmi.uucp)