cfchiesa@bsu-cs.UUCP (Christopher Chiesa) (09/09/88)
Tried to post the following on 28 August, but have received no indication
that it ever got off this site -- not ONE followup nor E-mail response. For-
give me if you saw this before, but you should have said something.
------
Hi gang...
Well, I've finally figured out what the problem has been all this time I've
been having trouble with Lattice C (v3.03). Namely, compiling-and-linking
under ARP produces binaries that work ONLY under AmigaDOS, and NOT under ARP!
Compiling-and-linking under AmigaDOS, on the other hand, produces binaries
that work under BOTH AmigaDOS AND ARP.
Ideally, one would want compiled programs to work properly under BOTH
AmigaDOS and ARP, but I would have expected that if there were any incompati-
bility, it would have been that a program would work ONLY in the environment
in which it was compiled -- NOT the OTHER way around as I am observing!
I figure this has either already been beaten to death and I missed it,
being a relatively new reader of this group, OR this is big news and will
spark a lively controversy.
I'm looking forward to the commentary on this one.
Chris Chiesa
--
UUCP: <backbones>!{iuvax,pur-ee,uunet}!bsu-cs!cfchiesa
cfchiesa@bsu-cs.UUCP paleo@ecsvax.uncecs.edu (Dr. Constantine A. LaPasha) (09/16/88)
I'm running my Lattice C environment while under ARP and the few (admittedly very simple) programs I've compiled seem to run OK under ARP. BTW- how can I determine what version (release?) of the ARP library I've got? -- Kostya LaPasha paleo@uncecs.edu or paleo@ecsvax.uncecs.edu - comments, opinions, etc. are mine NOT those of NCSU -