dmg@ssc-vax.UUCP (David Geary) (11/11/88)
John Toebes writes: In article <AXQysJy00UkaQKg0cg@andrew.cmu.edu> bader+@andrew.cmu.edu (Miles Bader) writes: >>I was under the impression that the following program: >> int foo(int bar) >> { >> return bar; >> } >>was a valid ansi-c program. HC (an ansi-compatible compiler) accepts >>it, lattice c 4.1 doesn't. Reporter: Senator Quayle - If you were suddenly called upon to make the Lattice C compiler ANSI compatible, in the unfortunate circumstance of the death of the president, would your compiler (version 5.0), be ANSI compatible? >Lattice C V4.1 does not conform to the standard that has been voted out. >With the V5.0 compiler, we have moved toward this standard. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >Note that 4.x does not support sequence points, stringizing, adjacent string >concatenation, or the signed keyword. These and many other issues have been >addressed by the addition of the ANSI features to the 5.0 product. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >/*---------------------All standard Disclaimers apply---------------------*/ >/*----Working for but not officially representing SAS or Lattice Inc.-----*/ >/*----John A. Toebes, VIII usenet:...!mcnc!rti!sas!toebes-----*/ >/*------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) Is Lattice 5.0 going to be *fully* ANSI compatible -yes or no ? Filler for the stupid mailer. Filler for the stupid mailer. Filler for the stupid mailer. Filler for the stupid mailer. Filler for the stupid mailer. Filler for the stupid mailer. Filler for the stupid mailer. Filler for the stupid mailer. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ David Geary, Boeing Aerospace, ~ ~ #define Seattle RAIN ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
gay%elde.epfl.ch@cunyvm.cuny.edu (David Gay) (11/11/88)
How could it be *fully* compatible with a standard that doesn't yet exist ? (:-)) David Gay GAY@ELDE.EPFL.CH, OR GAY%ELDE.EPFL.CH@CLSEPF51.bitnet