) Seaman) (09/09/89)
esker@abaa.uucp (Lawrence Esker) writes:
< I was wondering (not meant to be a flame), but why use VD0: anymore?
< What does it offer that RAD: doesn't? Why did Perry upgrade it after
< RAD: came out?
<
< Comparative data and other responses are welcome. Just wondering!
< --
< UseNet Path: __!mailrus!sharkey!itivax!abaa!esker == esker@abaa.UUCP
My guess would be that it simply provides the one thing that RAD:
doesn't, namely a dynamically allocated ramdisk. This is a *very*
handy feature to have around.
--
Chris (Insert phrase here) Seaman | ///
crs@cpsc6a.att.com <or> | /// Only AMIGA
...!att!cpsc6a!crs | \\\/// Makes it Possible!
The Home of the Killer Smiley | \XX/