rwm@atronx.UUCP (Russell McOrmond) (10/24/89)
In a message from: page%swap@Sun.COM (Bob Page) Dated 20 Oct 89 07:51:16 GMT >That's because the moderator hasn't been doing a very good job of >posting the submitted code. The Amiga community needs a FAST, RELIABLE >moderator, so I had a long talk with him today and convinved him that >one-day turnaround (in a standard file format) was ESSENTIAL. He agreed; >said he'd repent and turn over the new leaf today (Thursday). Hmmm.. Interesting posting ;-) Anyways, I'm curious if the 'blame' (If there really 'is' a problem) lies more on the developers. I've seen some of the postings about the Comp.{Source/Binaries}.amiga and have always thought : Hey Guys, Bob isn't WRITING all of this, he can only post what is submited. While one day turnaround of Submited programs would spread things out a bit, I can definetely understand why things are prefered to be done in Bulk - Makes the 'total' job easier - It's not as if you're getting paid for this, it's Volunteer work. But then again, I may not know what I am talking about ;-) -- Opinions expressed in this message are my Own. My Employer does not even know what Usenet IS. Russell McOrmond nrcaer!fts1!atronx!rwm@carleton.ca ^^^^ <--New SiteName! FidoNet 1:163/109 [(613) 231-7144 ] BBS: (613) 230-2282 I wanna POINT you in the right direction.