drew@cgofs.dec.com (Steve Drew 26-Nov-1989 2158) (11/27/89)
I bought a Supra 8up board with 2 meg installed, and stuck this into slot 2 of my Amiga 2000. In Slot one exists my a 2090A, the rest of the bus is empty. I happened to of benchmarked one of my programs before installing the supra memory, and noticed that the benchmark ran 50% SLOWER after intalling the supra memory. I am doing, FASTMEMFIRST, in fact if I did not do a fast memfirst and the benchmark loaded into the internal 1 meg of the A2000 then it ran at it's normal speed. I wrote a small 'for' loop program todo 1 million loops. This ran at exactly 10 secs. on the internal 1 meg, and 15 secs on the supra external memory. Observations: ------------- 1. I removed all drive cabling from 2090A .. Still 15 Secs. 2. If I removed the 2090A, the supra memory ran at 10 secs. 3. If I put the Supra board in Slot 1 and 2090A in slot 2 then after one warm reboot, then the supramem runs fast. (***) 4. If I put the supraboard in slot 3 and 2090A in slot 1 then the supra works fast (10secs). Thus leaving one empty space between the modules. Summary, -------- Of course the solution was '4.' above. I called Supra and they we're interested in my findings and said they will get back to me. (still waiting >1 week). If I had'nt of benchmarked this I would of never noticed this problem. I wonder if anyone else has this problem and does'nt know it???? Anybody got any ideas? /Steve ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Steve Drew at ENET: CGFSV1::DREW ARPA: drew%cgofs.dec.com@decwrl.dec.com USENET: {decvax!decwrl}!cgofs.dec.com!drew ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
rsingh1@dahlia.waterloo.edu (11/28/89)
Not much to do with your original message, but I too have a question about benchmarks. I'm running 2 megs, 1.5 on an insider board on an A1000. With a 68010. I have run 2 benchmark utilities. One is called 'checkspeed', and one is called 'si' (a cramden utility). Well, here's what one reports: Amiga System Information 1.0 Gerald Brandt 21-Jul-88 EXEC reports a 68010 CPU Available memory is 746 KBytes CPU Timings Copy Blocks in CHIP memory is 412 ticks vs 621 150 % Copy Blocks in FAST memory is 388 ticks vs 621 160 % Move from register to CHIP memory is 503 ticks vs 855 169 % Move from register to FAST memory is 457 ticks vs 855 187 % Move from data reg to data reg is 457 ticks vs 476 104 % Unsigned divide in data register is 1566 ticks vs 1812 115 % Unsigned multiply in data register is 823 ticks vs 856 104 % Unsigned multiply in CHIP memory is 992 ticks vs 911 91 % Unsigned multiply in FAST memory is 964 ticks vs 911 94 % Stack manipulation ( MOVEM.L ) is 620 ticks vs 598 96 % Total percentage speed: 127 % (The checkspeed output). The si program gives my rating as 1.2 times a standard A1000. MY QUESTION IS THIS: How much of this rather 'special' increase comes from my fast memory, and how much from the 68010. If someone has an insider, or just a 68010, I could mail you the utilities, if you could perform the benchmark, and get back to me. Later