cmcmanis%pepper@Sun.COM (Chuck McManis) (12/12/89)
In article <2240@leah.Albany.Edu> jac423@leah.Albany.Edu (Jules Cisek) writes: > ... I want to generate interest in >more MIDI software and you and that Chuck dude just keep getting on my >case. I assume you mean me, I'm sorry if I "got on your case" the point is ... > ... If you really want, I'll post the list of ST MIDI software from >Electronic Musician (It's really, really long) and you can sit there and >try to prove to me that the Amiga has a comparable amount. ... not that the ST or the Amiga has a comparable *amount* of MIDI software, only that it has comparable *quality* software. The Amiga has a zillion paint programs too but if you looked at each one's quality and usability you would find a lot of overlap. Take the "best" ST MIDI package and compare it to the "best" Amiga package. Then compare it to the "best" Mac package and the "best" IBM-PC package. If one system had 8 zillion lousy packages and 5 good packages, and another had 5 lousy and 5 good packages, then just compare the good ones who cares how many different ones there are? --Chuck McManis uucp: {anywhere}!sun!cmcmanis BIX: cmcmanis ARPAnet: cmcmanis@Eng.Sun.COM These opinions are my own and no one elses, but you knew that didn't you. "If it didn't have bones in it, it wouldn't be crunchy now would it?!"