detert@lognet2.af.mil (CMS David K. Detert) (12/22/89)
>In article <25164@cup.portal.com> thad@cup.portal.com (Thad P Floryan) writes: >>Confirming Joe's report of the San Jose Mercury News' article about the >>Amiga. >> >>However, here's a DIRECT and EXACT paragraph from the article; see if you can >>figure out what "costs more than $2,000 less" means. That's just ONE of many >>unusual things in the article. Sigh. Well, at least it's a start! :-) In a followup article, Bill Nurphy responds: >Inserting a comma at the appropriate place makes the statement clear. >" The recently announced Amiga 2500/30 model, sporting a 68030 > processor running at 25 megahertz (sic), 2 megabytes of RAM, a > math co-processor and a 40-megabyte hard drive, costs more than > $2,000, less than its Macintosh IIci counterpart. >" ^ Funny, but I read it as saying that the difference in price of the 2 systems was greater than $2000 and that the price advantage went to our beloved Amy, which is where is should be, right????? Cheers, Dave CMSgt David K Detert, USAF MILNet: detert@lognet2.af.mil